From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6HmSFUSVml8sWAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:11:16 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id QCFqEUSVml/yJQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:11:16 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5ECA9402A0 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51166 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kY4tm-000860-K4 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:11:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41308) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kY4ta-00085o-Ev for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:11:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40397) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kY4ta-0002xK-5g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:11:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kY4ta-00039N-19 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44197] Disable khal test suite? (was Re: [bug#44197] [PATCH] gnu: khal: Update to 0.10.2.) Resent-From: Lars-Dominik Braun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44197 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Leo Famulari Cc: 44197-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44197-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D44197.160396626012102 (code D ref 44197); Thu, 29 Oct 2020 10:11:01 +0000 Received: (at 44197-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2020 10:11:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51943 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kY4tY-000398-0Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:11:00 -0400 Received: from mout-p-102.mailbox.org ([80.241.56.152]:52474) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kY4tV-00038u-CI for 44197-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:10:58 -0400 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:2:0]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-102.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CMLmq1T1BzQlWP; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:10:51 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6xq.net; s=MBO0001; t=1603966249; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lAhLTCWffDM4WCNUN3QGrfz+BKjdK+lu2LZC4+CM7iU=; b=RU9AlCHxGPH3U0FoZQcmLai6ujY/ITOLWlo6HiqIKfxGLBB+in/bYs9Bqdbk0KQ3wLMH0m fC+uHzzbSFTnw1tWY+xq990M6fmTHtUr2bGg/a2nMkXH1oreS86e8lZKRpm0G/w92A52SB 1/non1UZCKaK8E6npEdi1lnJiCOHEhE3jDAFsPkp8J7s+jl3nb3O2gCmeJ4pmeE1opupwz 5KdqgO8u6jbSjpQPwJbx7+9jbNtJCHy09O03dEg3SA2STQCaZ3MheyT2K0I4RUQj7zRzN5 sZuB6N64K5wnJZSHGV/Ry9fixL0iNctxMqKMcW1FAAfdjLl+QBJhHYlZU1UlSQ== Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.241]) by spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.122]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id Ynw2DhBeQ3cS; Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:10:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 11:10:44 +0100 From: Lars-Dominik Braun Message-ID: <20201029101044.GA1328@noor.fritz.box> References: <20201024182333.GA69388@noor.fritz.box> <20201025181429.GC25773@jasmine.lan> <20201026073724.GA1390@noor.fritz.box> <20201026173900.GA16584@jasmine.lan> <20201027081410.GA1432@noor.fritz.box> <20201027215906.GA11357@jasmine.lan> <20201028072213.GA1532@noor.fritz.box> <20201028163005.GC12095@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20201028163005.GC12095@jasmine.lan> X-MBO-SPAM-Probability: X-Rspamd-Score: -4.66 / 15.00 / 15.00 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CA82F17B0 X-Rspamd-UID: abb143 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=6xq.net header.s=MBO0001 header.b=RU9AlCHx; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=6xq.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: Kas7X/gCZ7uh Hi Leo, some more data points: - works consistently inside a VM (Common KVM processor) with Ubuntu 20.04 ā†’ not the kernel version/configuration or OS. - whether it works or not does not change during the day ā†’ not time related(?) - works consistently on a different laptop with i5-8250U and Gentoo ā†’ not the processor After looking at how test_birthdays_29feb fails, Iā€™m leaning towards the possiblity of a bug in khal. So, I commented here: https://github.com/pimutils/khal/issues/860#issuecomment-718583031 > Are you using the same kernel versions on your two machines? I guess the > kernel configs likely don't match between them. No, previously the Ubuntu machine used 5.3 and now after upgrading to 20.04 version 5.4. The test suite is still failing there and still succeeding on my desktop, which is using a custom kernel configuration tailored to this particular machine (version 5.8 right now). Cheers, Lars