[bug#43881] [PATCH 1/2] system: Add %base-packages-disk-utils.

[Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2625 bytes --]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 11:17:08AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:
> 
> > * gnu/system.scm (%base-packages-disk-utils): New variable.
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
> >    #:use-module (guix diagnostics)
> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages admin)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages base)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages bash)
> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages compression)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages cross-base)
> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages cryptsetup)
> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages disk)
> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages file-systems)
> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages firmware)
> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages gawk)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages guile)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages guile-xyz)
> > -  #:use-module (gnu packages admin)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages hurd)
> > -  #:use-module (gnu packages linux)
> > -  #:use-module (gnu packages pciutils)
> > -  #:use-module (gnu packages package-management)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages less)
> > -  #:use-module (gnu packages zile)
> > -  #:use-module (gnu packages nano)
> > -  #:use-module (gnu packages gawk)
> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages linux)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages man)
> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages nano)
> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages package-management)
> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages pciutils)
> >    #:use-module (gnu packages texinfo)
> > -  #:use-module (gnu packages compression)
> > -  #:use-module (gnu packages firmware)
> > +  #:use-module (gnu packages zile)
> >    #:use-module (gnu services)
> >    #:use-module (gnu services shepherd)
> >    #:use-module (gnu services base)
> 
> Does it pull new modules or just reorder them?  If the latter, fine with me!

It reorders them and adds cryptsetup, disk and file-systems.

> > @@ -159,6 +163,7 @@
> >              %base-packages-interactive
> >              %base-packages-linux
> >              %base-packages-networking
> > +            %base-packages-disk-utils
> >              %base-packages-utils
> 
> Now there’s a precedent but I think we should have written “utilities”
> for consistency with the rest of the code base.
> 
> Maybe you can do that here and then we can deprecate
> ‘%base-packages-utils’ in favor of ‘%base-package-utilities’.

+1 for utilities over utils

> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]