unofficial mirror of guix-patches@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
To: Marius Bakke <marius@gnu.org>
Cc: 43591@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#43591] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: glibc-final: Catch all cases of a glibc user not requesting 64-bit offsets and then using readdir.
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:36:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200925153646.6ef95908@scratchpost.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200925122004.38275411@scratchpost.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3070 bytes --]

> >Why is this not an issue with i686 on x86_64 kernels?  
> 
> I'm not sure.  I'll check.

$ cat a00.c
#include <stdio.h>
#if defined( __ILP32__ )
#warning ILP32
#endif
int main() {
        return sizeof(off_t);
}
$ LC_ALL=C guix environment -s i686-linux gcc-toolchain -- gcc -o a00 a00.c
a00.c:3:2: warning: #warning ILP32 [-Wcpp]
    3 | #warning ILP32
      |  ^~~~~~~
$ ./a00
$ echo $?
4

That means they are using the Linux kernel's X86_32 ABI.
It has its own getdents64 system call that returns another value for d_off.

$ LC_ALL=C guix environment -s i686-linux gcc-toolchain -- gcc -o a00 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 a00.c
a00.c:3:2: warning: #warning ILP32 [-Wcpp]
    3 | #warning ILP32
      |  ^~~~~~~
$ ./a00
$ echo $?
8

That is why __i686__ is not affected--at the cost of the kernel lying to us
about the file system.

Note that I also tried printing the actual d_off values[1]--on ILP32, even with
_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, the VALUES are still 32 bits, and the same values as
without _FILE_OFFSET_BITS.  The d_off SLOT gets bigger on _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64.

(I also tried printing the actual d_off values[1] on x86_64 without any guix
environment -s, I get entirely different d_off values!!)

I also tried the former on native ARMHF--you get 32 bits d_off values.  And d_off
is always the same size as off_t.

off_t size changes depending on _FILE_OFFSET_BITS.

I do not have access to a real aarch64 machine--so no idea how it is there.
That would be the most interesting case, because those don't have X86_32,
so ILP32 is either not present or implemented differently.

ppc64 would also be interesting...

Test result of [1]:

system _FILE_OFFSET_BITS off_t   d_off-sizeof   d_off-values
-------------------------------------------------------------
x86_64 -                 8 Byte  8 Byte         8 Byte
i686   -                 4 Byte  4 Byte         4 Byte
i686   64                8 Byte  8 Byte         4 Byte
i686   32                4 Byte  4 Byte         4 Byte
i686   7                 4 Byte  4 Byte         4 Byte
armhf  -                 4 Byte  4 Byte         4 Byte
armhf  64                8 Byte  8 Byte         4 Byte
armhf  32                4 Byte  4 Byte         4 Byte
armhf  7                 4 Byte  4 Byte         4 Byte

This is all without qemu--in order to simplify the test case.

So I take it ext4 has some special compilation mode for 32 bits...

Could someone please test [1] on (real!) aarch64 and ppc64 and ppc32
machines?

[1] $ cat a00.c 
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <dirent.h>
#if defined( __ILP32__ )
#warning ILP32
#endif

int main() {
        DIR* d;
        struct dirent* ent;
        d = opendir("/tmp");
        errno = 0;
        assert(sizeof(ent->d_off) == sizeof(off_t));
        while ((ent = readdir(d)) != NULL) {
                printf("%llu\n", (unsigned long long) ent->d_off);
        }
        if (errno)
                perror("readdir");
        return sizeof(off_t);

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-25 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-24 14:12 [bug#43591] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: glibc-final: Catch all cases of a glibc user not requesting 64-bit offsets and then using readdir Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-24 14:16 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-24 18:17 ` Marius Bakke
2020-09-24 20:27   ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-24 23:11     ` Marius Bakke
2020-09-25 10:20       ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-25 10:42         ` [bug#43591] [PATCH v2 core-updates] gnu: glibc-final: Catch all cases of a glibc user not requesting 64-bit offsets and then using readdir regardless Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-25 13:36         ` Danny Milosavljevic [this message]
2020-09-25 15:33           ` [bug#43591] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: glibc-final: Catch all cases of a glibc user not requesting 64-bit offsets and then using readdir Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-26  1:42           ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-26  1:49             ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-29 14:51               ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-27  6:43           ` Efraim Flashner
2020-09-25 20:03       ` Andreas Enge
2020-09-26 10:50         ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-29 20:52       ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-09-29 22:09         ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-30  9:32           ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-09-30 10:28             ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-01  7:14               ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-10-02  7:18                 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-02  8:12                   ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-02  9:47                     ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-02  9:32                   ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-10-06 15:39                 ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-25 10:24   ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-30  8:45 ` [bug#43591] [PATCH core-updates v2 0/5] " Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-30  8:45   ` [bug#43591] [PATCH core-updates v2 1/5] gnu: glibc-final: Catch all cases of a glibc user not requesting 64-bit offsets and then using readdir regardless Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-30 16:55     ` Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-30  8:45   ` [bug#43591] [PATCH core-updates v2 2/5] build-system/gnu: Explicity declare the _FILE_OFFSET_BITS we want Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-30  8:45   ` [bug#43591] [PATCH core-updates v2 3/5] gnu: glibc: Do not explicitly set _FILE_OFFSET_BITS Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-30  8:45   ` [bug#43591] [PATCH core-updates v2 4/5] gnu: glibc-mesboot0: " Danny Milosavljevic
2020-09-30  8:45   ` [bug#43591] [PATCH core-updates v2 5/5] gnu: rhash: Explicity declare the _FILE_OFFSET_BITS we want Danny Milosavljevic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200925153646.6ef95908@scratchpost.org \
    --to=dannym@scratchpost.org \
    --cc=43591@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=marius@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).