From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id +BoSNYtiMV9bOwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:06:51 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id SHboMItiMV8haQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:06:51 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F6B29402CB for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54832 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k59Nx-0007i1-Up for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:06:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43940) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k59NC-0006hM-Es for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:06:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53881) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k59NC-0004Oq-5r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:06:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k59NC-0003DB-1A for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42800] [PATCH] Add (guix git-repo-download). Resent-From: Danny Milosavljevic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42800 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= Cc: 42800@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42800-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42800.159707192012252 (code B ref 42800); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 15:06:01 +0000 Received: (at 42800) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2020 15:05:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37187 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k59MW-0003BX-Im for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:05:20 -0400 Received: from dd26836.kasserver.com ([85.13.145.193]:50096) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k59MS-0003BI-Nk for 42800@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 11:05:19 -0400 Received: from localhost (80-110-127-146.cgn.dynamic.surfer.at [80.110.127.146]) by dd26836.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C1CF33653D3; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 17:05:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 17:05:12 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic Message-ID: <20200810170512.1018ca51@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: <20200810145058.bxmw2kealjvk5a5x@gravity> References: <20200810113931.10003-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <20200810145058.bxmw2kealjvk5a5x@gravity> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/nBCg3pVZvCh+6/S5U128q2Z"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.11 X-TUID: dtOiNkvQFDBi --Sig_/nBCg3pVZvCh+6/S5U128q2Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:50:58 +0200 Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka wrote: > I think the commit message and/or commentary is written somewhat > confusingly here. It took me a while to realize that "git-repo" is the > name of a tool that manages a multi-repository, and not just short for > "git repository". > How about replacing "git-repo repository" with "repository managed with > the git-repo tool" or "git-repo-based multirepository"? Sure. Where? In the "Commentary" comment? Good idea. The naming "git-repo" is not great. To be fair to upstream, their tool is called "repo", not "git-repo". Not sure if that's better though. Also, I thought about naming our downloader (guix repo-download) instead of (guix git-repo-download), but I thought that wouldn't improve things either. Would it? --Sig_/nBCg3pVZvCh+6/S5U128q2Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl8xYigACgkQ5xo1VCww uqVkRAf/S8giQQHQXE/Z504UMcZHWS7ackP3K460S2q2ZFj5TaRGU0p5R0Ai/fFy Cx3SnULe8WHlmJC84O4IuPJBvIjrxRQmLMS+aqQXBglHKvAKhs5WIH/ybZlz10lk HdeDS37zhfyx4jwIEq6UOXjCsibRO264h5STWAoEl0pNri0nqrz/pzIkCx2tq1v5 avL3CjSW0/Xaaj3FAwvPGnZxAnH3b355rZt/9+5apv4cmFjvWUDa7s7ikaiLnNck oILm9PBsKSpBUk4o1VbZmS1mnGRQO2PvaSkBOyipP4smod+sX4XTBni7WiLwdXHW R/0e9uiZrQTyBkjWys+4Q9Z0CfRvig== =UdgZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/nBCg3pVZvCh+6/S5U128q2Z--