From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id APBUFUK/MF9HMgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 03:30:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id eEUdEUK/MF+/aAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 03:30:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E3D94051D for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 03:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45546 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4yVk-0006f3-An for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 23:30:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4yVe-0006ei-Lc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 23:30:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4yVe-0008UI-CE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 23:30:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4yVe-0007xw-2V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 23:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42734] Export android-platform-system-core Resent-From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 03:30:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42734 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Julien Lepiller Cc: 42734@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: guix-patches@gnu.org, 42734@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.159703017230565 (code B ref -1); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 03:30:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2020 03:29:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33813 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4yVA-0007wv-Jg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 23:29:32 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k4yV8-0007wn-IC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 23:29:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4yV8-0006aq-Bc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 23:29:30 -0400 Received: from cyberdimension.org ([2001:910:1314:ffff::1]:39010 helo=gnutoo.cyberdimension.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k4yV6-0008R0-3V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2020 23:29:30 -0400 Received: from gnutoo.cyberdimension.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cyberdimension.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5bbdb43b; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 03:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from primarylaptop.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [::1]) by gnutoo.cyberdimension.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id bac8faa4; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 03:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:27:50 +0200 From: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli Message-ID: <20200810052750.23795deb@primarylaptop.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20200810051949.737d799e@primarylaptop.localdomain> References: <20200807024423.1638d242@primarylaptop.localdomain> <13A86DDA-5411-495A-B6AC-042A9F932065@lepiller.eu> <20200810051949.737d799e@primarylaptop.localdomain> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.5 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/yQKX=WNAWEcgTdrMFLdkU33"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:910:1314:ffff::1; envelope-from=GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org; helo=gnutoo.cyberdimension.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.11 X-TUID: vYvDG3vYtHdJ --Sig_/yQKX=WNAWEcgTdrMFLdkU33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 05:19:49 +0200 Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > On Fri, 07 Aug 2020 07:33:03 -0400 > Julien Lepiller wrote: >=20 > > Unfortunately, android-platform-core should first be fixed to accept > > a hash as an argument, otherwise any other version will fail. Don't > > know why we haven't done that before=E2=80=A6 >=20 > I don't understand what the hash would be here, nor the consequences > you describe. Do you have some pointers on the documentation or source > code that I should read to better understand that? >=20 > By the way I find it a bit strange to refer to have to manually > extract android-platform-system-core to be able to refer its include > path. > Instead of just that: > > #:make-flags (list (string-append "CFLAGS=3D " > > "-I " (assoc-ref %build-inputs "android-core") > > "/include ")) > > [...])) One way of doing that would be to create an android-system-core-header package and reference that. Does that look like a good idea? Denis. --Sig_/yQKX=WNAWEcgTdrMFLdkU33 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEeC+d2+Nrp/PU3kkGX138wUF34mMFAl8wvrYACgkQX138wUF3 4mPD8w/+LY9698Fu0iUCKGztzWy2VT4PSikUharw66gwN8FIQI0DWN8bz6dmVPGt bCfNPsfPSCre1axYxvB1FgMMzR9l40LTAyorw7U1IxgdFBJQTTz8er9ti6AxTUBA bm4AIK/+Ny5lga4gG4zUmvInaTcmSS6czioZQ3IK/+3LS64zCeTG65+hJB6UUhlz aCACYu0tvJNO3BC8eC7bahzdMVjKsXuM0PMXxrBfiLpBTMoMVWsngzNIaezfe/9d pD+k1O/ZO/u5uNz4Z0whHEyeKclMpcQ9rFO5Q6IOeqCMZRUX9nWyd5u5b2/nWywH pdrviGShrhv8jdudGPE5fVr9xISL65zfWg9LLqmolbdoZlnloEwUDOXe3diE1Aio 99IUKzJEsRy3DXCsS+aLirTaaJla1KsJXAwDQECIBVoD86yhIuI9ed/+551pqaOk 2vltaNA5jfqfl5D0rk0U44B8/wZb4TDGBUmKYSqIawV/y9UeiQlEih0QwzOOI5CH eEI5Pvc0u+bAEsHZmCK+qu/ejuWYlxQe867VB3eb9IuZH5bttwGFbTzPHVfzh9C5 vi8JAKlRXCGvSlfVz/fS9E3zLybUMgeNqP5ReMLEdPWu8DW3nThqFUJABaJNrCaF +OfSABm+h3SAJVbpL7tSp8+R9Q0l8uwJkgEHX/3VPBrXVHdwMrk= =lBBx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/yQKX=WNAWEcgTdrMFLdkU33--