From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 3qGbE+CPHl/SEwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:27:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id eO0ND+CPHl+EAQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:27:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B1EC9400C7 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54350 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzyTU-0002J4-Pj for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 04:27:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47920) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzyTO-0002Ig-Ju for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 04:27:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42413) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jzyTO-0004Iy-Aj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 04:27:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jzyTO-0004mp-5v for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 04:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42364] [PATCH v2] gnu: Add python-robber. Resent-From: Tanguy Le Carrour Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42364 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Marius Bakke Cc: 42364@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42364-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42364.159583839618368 (code B ref 42364); Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:27:02 +0000 Received: (at 42364) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2020 08:26:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53959 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jzySx-0004mC-QW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 04:26:36 -0400 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:33271) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jzySv-0004ly-So for 42364@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 04:26:34 -0400 Received: from localhost (static-176-185-184-238.axione.abo.bbox.fr [176.185.184.238]) (Authenticated sender: tanguy@bioneland.org) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8F3A240013; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 08:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:26:27 +0200 From: Tanguy Le Carrour Message-ID: <20200727082627.wmg4fplswlikpbwp@melmoth> References: <20200715122832.9196-1-tanguy@bioneland.org> <20200722081440.21986-1-tanguy@bioneland.org> <87wo2rtxfw.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87wo2rtxfw.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.51 X-TUID: 1RKNhJpaXFum Hi Marius, Le 07/25, Marius Bakke a écrit : > Tanguy Le Carrour writes: > > > * gnu/packages/python-check.scm (python-robber): New variable. > > [...] > > > + ;; The last version tagged in Github (0.1.0) is older than the one on PyPI. > > + ;; Reported upstream: . > > Wow, it's concerning that someone just uploaded a fork on PyPI without > notifying the original author, yet reuses the original home page. He might have tried, but… the original author's email address given on PyPI does not exist any more! > Even more so when there are no tags matching the uploaded tarball. > > I think we should adjust the home page of this package to point to the > fork, and maybe add a comment explaining the situation. WDYT? I've just send a email to the author of the last commit in the second repo. Let's see what will happen! In the worst case scenario, I can open a claim request on PyPI and fix the mess myself. But let's hope I don't have to do that! ^_^' -- Tanguy