From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJkhT-0007P6-AS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 17:15:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJkhS-00073k-FB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 17:15:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJkhS-00073Y-Aj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 17:15:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJkhS-00032J-4U for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 17:15:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#40350] [PATCH] ui: Mention that changes to package definitions can cause "upgrades". Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 17:13:52 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20200401211352.GA9794@jasmine.lan> References: <871rp6udet.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <871rp6udet.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 40350@debbugs.gnu.org On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:03:22PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Is that not implied in a way? It is, but I think we will still get some confused users asking about it. > If it is, how about something shorter like: > > (dependencies or package changed) Yeah, I think that's okay.