I didn't realize we had so much of lxqt packaged. Some comments inline: On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 09:11:06PM +0430, Hamzeh Nasajpour wrote: > * gnu/packages/lxqt.scm (lxqt-organizer): New variable. > --- > gnu/packages/lxqt.scm | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/lxqt.scm b/gnu/packages/lxqt.scm > index a440491633..7ef6ca51ce 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/lxqt.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/lxqt.scm > @@ -1269,6 +1269,40 @@ QTermWidget.") > easily publishing them on internet image hosting services.") > (license license:gpl2+))) > > +(define-public lxqt-organizer > + (package > + (name "lxqt-organizer") > + (version "v0.003") The author seems to be using this time to do some rapid development and has already (at the time I checked) already bumped the version to v0.6.0. Can you update to the most recent version? > + (source > + (origin > + (method git-fetch) > + (uri (git-reference > + (url (string-append "https://github.com/lxqt/organizer.git")) > + (commit "5aa556aa0f0409e00fac5b63d9118ff228d2e840") > + (recursive? #t))) I was going to mention using the version string for the commit but it seems they haven't pushed any tags to the repo. Can you add a comment saying they haven't tagged any releases in git? Also, it doesn't look like there are any submodules so you don't need 'recursive? #t' > + (file-name (git-file-name name version)) > + (sha256 > + (base32 "1czs9gca7aqsfcnxhi7nzq97pxbmhfgbfh00j7nl8cig0yxb6apv")))) > + (build-system cmake-build-system) > + (inputs > + `(("kwindowsystem" ,kwindowsystem) > + ("liblxqt" ,liblxqt) > + ("libqtxdg" ,libqtxdg) > + ("qtbase" ,qtbase) > + ("qtsvg" ,qtsvg) > + ;;("qtlinguist" ,qttools) > + ("qtx11extras" ,qtx11extras))) guix gc --references /path/to/item doesn't list all the inputs, so many of them can actually be moved to native-inputs. > + (native-inputs > + `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config) > + ("lxqt-build-tools" ,lxqt-build-tools) > + ("qttools" ,qttools))) > + (arguments > + '(#:tests? #f)) I saw that there were no tests in the repo, please add a note. > + (home-page "https://lxqt.org/") Is there a project-specific home-page? If not I'd recommend just using the github repo as the home-page. > + (synopsis "LXQt Organizer is a lightweight organizer for personal information management.") Perhaps: "LXQt desktop organizer" or "LXQt organizer for personal information management" Actually the second sounds clunky. "LXQt personal information management organizer" > + (description > + "This package provides a Qt-based application for managing meetings, events and other personal information.") > + (license license:lgpl2.1+))) > > (define-public lxqt-archiver > (package > -- > 2.25.1 > In addition, in the desktop file (in %out/share/application/) there's a second exec line which starts /usr/local/lxqt-organizer. Can you add a phase to patch that? Also, 'guix lint' complains about the length of two of the lines and about the period in the synopsis. -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted