From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jFN8h-0004sl-CD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 15:17:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFN8g-0007K5-DZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 15:17:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39691) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFN8g-0007JV-9Y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 15:17:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jFN8g-0007Kh-5n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 15:17:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#39777] [PATCH V3 02/11] gnu: python-cachy: Update to 0.3.0. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 15:16:25 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20200320191625.GB6988@jasmine.lan> References: <20200309081827.13489-1-tanguy@bioneland.org> <20200309081827.13489-2-tanguy@bioneland.org> <20200311191455.GA13879@jasmine.lan> <20200312085822.uhxgcckpmalaw2g6@rafflesia> <20200314173938.GF23309@jasmine.lan> <20200319172705.f2uuu7lxq2zyu6a6@melmoth> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200319172705.f2uuu7lxq2zyu6a6@melmoth> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Tanguy Le Carrour Cc: 39777@debbugs.gnu.org On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 06:27:05PM +0100, Tanguy Le Carrour wrote: > In the meantime, I'm pushing v4 of the patch set if you're OK with > disabling the failing tests and adding a comment pointing to the bug report. > If you're not, which is perfectly fine, I've reorganized the stack so that > you could commit the 8 patches up to `python-cachy`. That sounds fine, thanks!