From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58184) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEuiQ-0004VY-Rl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:56:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEuiP-00024c-Tl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:56:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEuiP-00023m-Q9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:56:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jEuiP-0005Pu-Nz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:56:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#40105] [PATCH] gnu: Add wol. Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58033) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEui8-0004Tf-1l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:55:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEui7-0001El-2F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:55:43 -0400 Received: from pat.zlotemysli.pl ([37.59.186.212]:53756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEui6-0000t5-NB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:55:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:55:27 +0100 From: Jakub =?UTF-8?Q?K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= Message-ID: <20200319125527.diyj7squla4jfhv2@gravity> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zgloqf3tczbboz72" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Vincent Legoll Cc: 40105@debbugs.gnu.org --zgloqf3tczbboz72 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 04:04:51PM +0100, Vincent Legoll wrote: > I don't know if having multiple packages doing the same is OK or not. > Nor do I know if there are differences between this "wol" and the > already packaged "wakelan"... I don't think having multiple packages for doing something is necessarily bad. > + (description "Tool to send a @code{magic} packet to wake another host > +on the network. This must be enabled on the target host, usually in the > +BIOS.") If I may ask, what's the rationale behind putting "magic" in a @code tag here? Apart from that, LGTM. Regards, Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka --zgloqf3tczbboz72 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE5Xa/ss9usT31cTO54xWnWEYTFWQFAl5za7kACgkQ4xWnWEYT FWTe1g/8DE342g7uML0CPcHjeoM80xzc2VZdKwaUMJfEA4rO2D0eD7qkTEl23cK7 BwP5h3FmC0hWU8OyEGi926nkqOcry3oP/wCiI945Yrq8MA915+MwDAwwcwrmi2/T ffPnQ2d9nyaedK1e0SSJRtZZkeyLqXiJrAPHr3KGwbqflJenhCbfmdY+/Gr1HKTD dgu1aERsd5PUFat2fSwxdPaYV9oSVlCD3PaOKZlas6a5AdsH1igU5iI+bkj2vpLD yo9AJDVnHKE2ng/I4RQqiq3L7n7Kc7E3UX9IkEVFfdNjYA44B7H0jpx8KoaBYCAB 1aZtL2U/wC3EhedXCyQbPs8Dae+gXE4Hi0faYND6fHB8J9guCTk2c2lS5Ut2LXkH WQgr5MfCHVPPPk3JPTrCWI9hKySF+GwTdcPAJfgS2oRn3mvtp62qllzc56/mJOg4 9I3ry8ZnudB/9JEsbe2BBfFn6L7B4YbINLrbn/uuYH8t26nKdyuTiTXydK182tod XrQf6fEivu4lmOffgw68Vj6zQr7H8ysiyEWRMDQ2VIHrCD4fYNAmOrccVPCx4Jcr 7ZDxuEhNcHl0aku6cym0PFdmVdl5GHh8Q15grfRgHuR2vK+fQnaQT+44t2uoIok7 k0F07YUq+D7zRqaZlhr4AQXvdBDFgzG4J/Hu2kWSVieC4YYr4PA= =lLFR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zgloqf3tczbboz72--