From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j6uy0-0007II-2m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:35:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6uxz-0003ju-0C for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:35:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50496) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6uxy-0003jM-NI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:35:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j6uxy-0004Ke-KJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:35:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39798] [PATCH 00/13] Update Pandoc. Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54807) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j6uxo-00077v-Lr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:34:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6uxj-0003IV-M9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:34:51 -0500 Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:41467) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6uxj-0003CX-En for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:34:47 -0500 Received: from bababa.home (lfbn-idf2-1-1315-147.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.129.147]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A26D3200004 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:34:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:34:42 +0100 Message-Id: <20200226113442.9798-1-mail@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 39798@debbugs.gnu.org Update ghc-pandoc to 2.92 and rename it to pandoc. This closes bug 33844. Questions: - Should this go on staging? It rebuilds a few hundred packages, maybe less than 300. - I'm not 100% sure that updating the Haskell libraries didn't break anything. I guess the continuous integration will tell us. - 3-4 libraries seemed to have many dependents and updating them would break stuff, so instead I created a versioned package, e.g. ghc-regex-base-0.94. Is this OK? Is there a best practice here? Pierre Neidhardt (13): gnu: ghc-hsyaml: Update to 0.2.1.0. gnu: ghc-doctemplates: Update to 0.8.1. gnu: Add ghc-regex-base-0.94. gnu: ghc-regex-pcre-builtin: Update to 0.95.1.1.8.43. gnu: ghc-skylighting-core: Update to 0.8.3.2. gnu: ghc-skylighting: Update to 0.8.3.2. gnu: ghc-pandoc-types: Update to 1.20. gnu: ghc-texmath: Update to 0.12.0.1. gnu: Add ghc-base-compat-0.11. gnu: Add ghc-optparse-applicative-0.15. gnu: ghc-haddock-library: Update to 1.8.0. gnu: ghc-pandoc: Update to 2.9.2. gnu: ghc-pandoc: Rename to pandoc. gnu/local.mk | 2 - gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm | 130 ++++++++++++------ .../patches/ghc-pandoc-fix-html-tests.patch | 92 ------------- .../patches/ghc-pandoc-fix-latex-test.patch | 31 ----- 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/ghc-pandoc-fix-html-tests.patch delete mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/ghc-pandoc-fix-latex-test.patch -- 2.25.0