From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46239) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwa4V-0003uy-Jj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 18:15:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwa4U-0007Cn-Ou for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 18:15:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwa4U-0007C9-L2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 18:15:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwa4U-0001p6-FF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 18:15:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39332] [PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to %BASE-PACKAGES. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 18:14:45 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20200128231445.GA17331@jasmine.lan> References: <1ca6544af3d10a72d2c6a6c7d7a12b67d887e104.1580250411.git.leo@famulari.name> <47a29486-a557-b7f5-645b-382b39eee571@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47a29486-a557-b7f5-645b-382b39eee571@web.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Jonathan Brielmaier Cc: 39332@debbugs.gnu.org On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:42:16PM +0100, Jonathan Brielmaier wrote: > This adds btrfs-progs, zstd and lzo to the closure with a total of > 7.7MiB. So that doesn't seem to big. I'm just wondering if we need btrfs > support here at all, as I would call btrfs still kind of exotic apart > from *SUSE distros and Facebook's backend. Yeah, maybe it is too niche. I use it on all my machines but that's just me. Let's wait to see if there are more comments before deciding.