From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48513) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ipduV-0006kq-KG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 14:56:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ipduU-0005XW-IV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 14:56:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ipduU-0005WJ-CV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 14:56:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ipduU-0007Ev-8Z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 14:56:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38815] guix-patches@ recorded as commit author (was: sassc: Update to 3.6.1.) Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 21:54:34 +0200 From: Efraim Flashner Message-ID: <20200109195434.GA1370@E5400> References: <8vPKTnwwfY4ecgts67qtXbG04xMreq2Oy8kmlI0Oix7RgxCHkExOcA79B4rjUq2i7Mu-lHpji6XXRy6DBWx9MOdZkhqvB6flKffTjO3wyr8=@protonmail.com> <871rs9evug.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871rs9evug.fsf@nckx> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 38815@debbugs.gnu.org --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 05:50:15PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-pa= tches via wrote: > Riku, Efraim, Guix, >=20 > I noticed that this commit and the preceding libsass update have an > incorrect author e-mail addres: >=20 > commit fc4eb87dc45b169e3912c73bbf60cb8ce76b7c7c > Author: Riku Viitanen via Guix-patches via >=20 > The actual patch posted to guix-patches[0] has two correct From: lines. >=20 > Does anyone know what happened here? And how it could be avoided? Is the > Web interface hiding anything strange about these messages? I caught one another time but this time they slipped through. I normally patch the pipe directly from mutt to 'cd workspace/guix; git am -S -s'. >=20 > Would a git hook to catch suspect addresses be a good idea? >=20 Probably couldn't hurt. > Kind regards, >=20 > T G-R >=20 > [0]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D38815 --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl4XhPcACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1El5A//fWAcJBZvT5uNTZcAUt6pxOeoJak5dRP3bqxjb8gLrufljzQqVTfaF8KZ UoSCwznFaZhoNx2/zvegbVY24y7n0f3/6FL/QSRnyL4fZzl77kW+SkJ4mErL98Ld UhCQbCiLWI4Jmui5gTLzLGOtkXrfex433wL6pPRJTS+LWDHSlaDQQ3tFG2ph2I+z JwRL61XC4zK0/Lm4BuQK2Gg914nFfxUfCOYomnCbcyGVZl5dxiTZQ11Uv3zPZJcm 8FduKFO8YoOJq1+KTBeLp5Je5wjQYpC0CtLyH0u2lQwfms96RxplxKZpsJ2P47Vu wuTgVxhImhbLzwhF667xyvafZQXUccNHrRl3hS8+VzlPdDqbn3CpkrZpTt93nl30 EnKZkKw0phtNOqXBAFUR6ytoKLc/afvNB7yfYIjtCs21FwjsgYXsyqDGErqAW2hu bMHczoIBNL9E7jhDIGtiqXh2sdcp34aQU7Hy+2PjYzY3DRFi9KijTnAwlTZk2n2+ M5TYfwBnZCcHRXIyxXBrX77myVbmMoBrTFR5IB5F7bpItvO8j9UyxuUDMVw7xUzN ArH3Ryqi5BgOWUNaQNl48OuP0CLX7libaBBwLadLhl2qSUo94mORaQHVvd9Va+HN /02r48Y77MKJ+DwlMfUTKca86qDYMtBao/vvQwWHs8eV6eyDIVc= =N2LD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS--