From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34501) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1imv1W-0007ke-QP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 02:36:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1imv1V-0005Vm-T9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 02:36:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60299) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1imv1V-0005Vi-Q9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 02:36:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imv1V-00015Q-Ne for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 02:36:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#38576] [PATCH] gnu: r-irkernel: Fix R kernel loading Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 08:35:36 +0100 From: Lars-Dominik Braun Message-ID: <20200102073536.GA3066@zpidnp36> References: <20191212074613.GA11713@zpidnp36> <87wob13mpn.fsf@elephly.net> <20191212100452.GE22717@zpidnp36> <87r210j5kq.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87r210j5kq.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 38576@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Ludo, > An argument in favor of the status quo would be that it allows users to > choose between ‘r’ and ‘r-minimal’. Is that a compelling argument? reading the documentation I thought this was possible using --with-input=r-minimal=r ? > However, if we go that route, we should arrange to not propagate > ‘r-minimal’ (it’s intrusive) and instead have ‘kernel.json’ do the right > thing. I’m not following, sorry. What do you suggest kernel.json should do? Lars