From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34767) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ilkQZ-0004tD-6M for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:05:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ilkQY-0006Io-6I for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:05:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54422) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ilkQY-0006Ic-2t for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:05:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ilkQX-0004ll-Uq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:05:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#38803] [PATCH] gnu: elfutils: Update to 0.178 Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 03:04:33 +0100 From: Mark Wielaard Message-ID: <20191230020433.GA2695@wildebeest.org> References: <20191230014101.2425-1-mark@klomp.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Brett Gilio Cc: 38803@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Brett, On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 01:44:21AM +0000, Brett Gilio wrote: > Funny you submitted this, I was working on the same package > about an hour ago. We must be reading each other's minds. You got > significantly farther than I did. Thanks for looking at it. This is my first guix patch, so please be gentle. I do maintain elfutils upstream, so I did have a little advantage picking some upstream patches which hadn't gone into the release yet. > One thing I did do differently was that I extended the list of > licenses to include the ones mentioned in the comment. I'll look at > your patch, and hopefully this will be ready for core-updates. Thank > you :) Good you mention the licenses. I forgot to update them licenses. 0.178 introduces some new documentation (man pages), one of them is under the GFDL (without invariant sections). Also I am not sure how precisely we should mention the dual gplv2+/lgplv3+ license for the "out" output libraries and the gplv3+ license for the "bin" output (and where the gfdl should be added). Thanks, Mark