From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58360) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ijHdL-0002Ci-Bg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 01:56:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ijHdK-0007pw-7Y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 01:56:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ijHdK-0007p4-39 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 01:56:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ijHdK-0002o0-1g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2019 01:56:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38149] [WIP] gnu: Add qgis. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 07:55:02 +0100 From: Danny Milosavljevic Message-ID: <20191223075502.3d9cd692@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20191109112702.14723-1-wz@freeshell.de> <20191218100751.6edc13ce@alma-ubu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/VoB_vZ/4=SaUZKsAArBaD9J"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= , 38149@debbugs.gnu.org, Wiktor =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=BBelazny?= --Sig_/VoB_vZ/4=SaUZKsAArBaD9J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Arun, On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:22:41 +0530 Arun Isaac wrote: > Yes, we should use proj instead of proj.4 wherever possible. But, if I > remember correctly, some packages work only with proj.4 for now. Also, > we should push some of the simpler patches (say, the simple update > patches) to master right away. That will help to declutter this bug > report a little bit. WDYT? Sure. Also, I think the licenses can be added right now. Likewise the package updates, but probably not the python 2.7 modification, especially if python 3 also inherits it. The latter should go to some other branch. What's up with libgeotiff's disabled tests? Also, I think we usually don't list the license of non-installed files (like the cmake includes). --Sig_/VoB_vZ/4=SaUZKsAArBaD9J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl4AZMYACgkQ5xo1VCww uqVfkAf/Qbbd3/nlIT0meqDwwz83ITbbhNCExQJOiUWiE5Aw7AFWWjTSLplVbdJw p8Ju5cLyLjfZrXdRj9Bm+9Oz+sGJoALwBpW1zBEc7ebmzZlKFD7gflcMQHqhAByc I9YI8/FEToBQu1t3GiqYtupaikRgEAn4ZlKtsvy00AXLK4giH9f56xzkZYyBXzbb LV7sPm4M6D/kFnmrILR1gjbYPY72aIUuSR026QnObB+LsfObh1ohSQAx1uW5YNdL Q7AYt1avpLytibEw3k0T5uFMTT14d9Ey46zBbco07QrkFV5OU9o2xH30Yy3hjCXw xInm3emTe738GOMx15pjSFRDxWfjeQ== =yWaa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/VoB_vZ/4=SaUZKsAArBaD9J--