On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 17:41:04 +0100 Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > I have not communicated with SWH about that, especially I have not > > asked SWH why they broke the API without updating the version > > number. > > Yeah, that’s weird, I’ve pinged them on IRC. > > It seems that the removal was intentional as part of > , but it wasn’t clear > whether the API breakage should have happened. This led them to open > a new task: . We should > keep an eye on it. I will be frequently linting and see what's happening :-) [..] > In the meantime, your patch looks like the right move, so you can > push it. Thanks for your review and further information, pushed as 356a79becc4061d158c68718ad169abac1ab672f Closing this ticket. Björn