From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55403) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQyIi-00036M-Kr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:39:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQyIg-00085k-NH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:39:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQyIg-00085O-9d for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:39:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQyIf-0003ge-Rl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:39:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#38030] [PATCH 13/13] gnu: kpmcore: Update to 4.0.1 Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 19:38:25 +0100 From: Miguel Arruga Vivas Message-ID: <20191102193825.0220ad25@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20191102090950.18043-13-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> References: <20191102090950.18043-1-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> <20191102090950.18043-13-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Hartmut Goebel Cc: 38030@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Hartmut, Just a couple of comments (although I'm not an official reviewer) about this patch. Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Also move to kde.scm, since it is a frameworks part. >=20 > * gnu/packages/kde-frameworks.scm(kpmcore): Move from here =E2=80=A6 > * gnu/packages/kde.scm(kpmcore): =E2=80=A6 to here, update to 4.0.1; > [inputs]: Add qttools; [native-inputs]: Add dbus; [arguments]: New > element. You moved kholidays to kde-frameworks.scm as it is now part of the framework, but this comment seems to suggest that the framework parts are located in kde.scm. Is there any reason to not keep it there? > + (arguments > + `(#:phases > + (modify-phases %standard-phases > + (replace 'check > + (lambda _ > + ;(setenv "HOME" (getcwd)) > + ;(setenv "TMPDIR" (getcwd)) > + ;(setenv "QT_QPA_PLATFORM" "offscreen") > + (invoke "dbus-launch" "ctest" ".")))))) That commented code seems a left over from previous tests. Perhaps it should be removed, perhaps a comment makes sense there. :) Best regards, Miguel