From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNvy2-0007V6-5X for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 05:33:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNvxw-0005uz-CQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 05:33:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNvxu-0005uG-AW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 05:33:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNvxu-0001E0-4o for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 05:33:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#37853] References: <20191021151628.28632-1-brice@waegenei.re> In-Reply-To: <20191021151628.28632-1-brice@waegenei.re> Resent-Message-ID: From: Brice Waegeneire Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:32:22 +0200 Message-Id: <20191025093223.31672-1-brice@waegenei.re> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 37853@debbugs.gnu.org In this patch version I have taken into account the remarks of Mathieu on line lenght and description phrasing. And followed Danny's take on the modified phases; it's *much* nicer than my copy/paste from the linux-module-build-system.