unofficial mirror of guix-patches@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: 36351@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#36351] [PATCH 08/10] packages: 'specification->package+output' distinguishes "no output specified".
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:22:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190624122212.5932-8-ludo@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190624122212.5932-1-ludo@gnu.org>

Until now the caller couldn't tell the different between a spec like
"foo:out" and one like "foo".  This change allows users to distinguish
between these two cases.

* gnu/packages.scm (specification->package+output): Disable output
membership test when OUTPUT = #f and SUB-DRV = #f.
* tests/packages.scm ("specification->package+output")
("specification->package+output invalid output")
("specification->package+output no default output")
("specification->package+output invalid output, no default"): New tests.
---
 gnu/packages.scm   |  8 ++++++--
 tests/packages.scm | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages.scm b/gnu/packages.scm
index 48390575ba..acb247e114 100644
--- a/gnu/packages.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages.scm
@@ -534,14 +534,18 @@ optionally contain a version number and an output name, as in these examples:
   guile@2.0.9:debug
 
 If SPEC does not specify a version number, return the preferred newest
-version; if SPEC does not specify an output, return OUTPUT."
+version; if SPEC does not specify an output, return OUTPUT.
+
+When OUTPUT is false and SPEC does not specify any output, return #f as the
+output."
   (let-values (((name version sub-drv)
                 (package-specification->name+version+output spec output)))
     (match (%find-package spec name version)
       (#f
        (values #f #f))
       (package
-       (if (member sub-drv (package-outputs package))
+       (if (or (and (not output) (not sub-drv))
+               (member sub-drv (package-outputs package)))
            (values package sub-drv)
            (leave (G_ "package `~a' lacks output `~a'~%")
                   (package-full-name package)
diff --git a/tests/packages.scm b/tests/packages.scm
index 613b2f1221..836d446657 100644
--- a/tests/packages.scm
+++ b/tests/packages.scm
@@ -1227,6 +1227,38 @@
     (lambda (key . args)
       key)))
 
+(test-equal "specification->package+output"
+  `((,coreutils "out") (,coreutils "debug"))
+  (list (call-with-values (lambda ()
+                            (specification->package+output "coreutils"))
+          list)
+        (call-with-values (lambda ()
+                            (specification->package+output "coreutils:debug"))
+          list)))
+
+(test-equal "specification->package+output invalid output"
+  'error
+  (catch 'quit
+    (lambda ()
+      (specification->package+output "coreutils:does-not-exist"))
+    (lambda _
+      'error)))
+
+(test-equal "specification->package+output no default output"
+  `(,coreutils #f)
+  (call-with-values
+    (lambda ()
+      (specification->package+output "coreutils" #f))
+    list))
+
+(test-equal "specification->package+output invalid output, no default"
+  'error
+  (catch 'quit
+    (lambda ()
+      (specification->package+output "coreutils:does-not-exist" #f))
+    (lambda _
+      'error)))
+
 (test-equal "find-package-locations"
   (map (lambda (package)
          (cons (package-version package)
-- 
2.22.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-24 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-24 12:18 [bug#36351] [PATCH 00/10] Add 'derivation-build-plan', improve (guix derivations) Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-24 12:22 ` [bug#36351] [PATCH 01/10] derivations: Add 'derivation-input' Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-24 12:22   ` [bug#36351] [PATCH 02/10] derivations: Rewrite and replace 'derivations-prerequisites-to-build' Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-24 12:22   ` [bug#36351] [PATCH 03/10] ui: 'show-what-to-build' uses 'derivation-build-plan' Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-24 12:22   ` [bug#36351] [PATCH 04/10] graph: Use 'derivation-input-derivation' Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-24 12:22   ` [bug#36351] [PATCH 05/10] derivations: <derivation-input> now aggregates a <derivation> Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-24 12:22   ` [bug#36351] [PATCH 06/10] derivations: 'derivation' preserves pointer equality Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-24 12:22   ` [bug#36351] [PATCH 07/10] derivations: 'build-derivations' can be passed derivation inputs Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-24 12:22   ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2019-06-24 12:22   ` [bug#36351] [PATCH 09/10] ui: 'show-what-to-build' accepts " Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-24 12:22   ` [bug#36351] [PATCH 10/10] ui: 'show-derivation-outputs' accepts <derivation-input> records Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-27  9:17 ` bug#36351: [PATCH 00/10] Add 'derivation-build-plan', improve (guix derivations) Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190624122212.5932-8-ludo@gnu.org \
    --to=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=36351@debbugs.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).