From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49151) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdGlE-000441-DC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:15:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdGlC-0003Kk-G5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:15:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60145) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hdGlC-0003K0-BE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:15:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hdGlB-0004rE-Us for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 12:15:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#35545] [PATCH] Add josm. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 18:14:47 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Message-ID: <20190618181447.405200fd@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <20190618142928.528d0b0b@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> References: <20190503145820.606f37db@sybil.lepiller.eu> <20190505131838.2ea2c6d9@alma-ubu> <20190505133709.049a2925@sybil.lepiller.eu> <20190506005353.3c9b20d7@alma-ubu> <20190618142928.528d0b0b@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/Jpiml1XtM/ZWA=YD.B.shWI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Julien Lepiller Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , 35545@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/Jpiml1XtM/ZWA=YD.B.shWI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Julien, On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:29:36 +0200 Julien Lepiller wrote: > Le Mon, 6 May 2019 00:53:53 +0200, > Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > > On Sun, 5 May 2019 13:37:09 +0200 > > Julien Lepiller wrote: > > =20 > > > > I know JOSM has plugins. Do you know anything about the licenses > > > > of these plugins? Should we/do we need to compile all of them > > > > from sources? Can we stick with the default Plugin-Repository? > > > > I'm thinking about FSDG-compatibility. > > > >=20 > > > > Bj=C3=B6rn [..] > So I've looked into that, but I haven't seen how to disable the plugin > manager. I've talked to a JOSM developper during State of the Map > France, and he told me every plugin was free software, and if not, it > should be considered a bug, and the plugin will be removed. I think > this is close to the spirit of the FSDG, so we might not have to > disable the manager. WDYT? >=20 > I agree it would be nicer to bootstrap plugins properly ourselves, but > at least we won't advertise for non free plugins. I'll try to update > to a newer version before pushing, unless you have more objections. I feel a bit uncomfortable in deciding this on my own, though I think it would be OK: We don't add the binaries directly and as you said, all plugins should be free software (maybe not fully bootstrappable). I'm adding Ludo and Ricardo in CC, I think they are more authoritative in giving a final answer. Thanks for discussing this with upstream. Bj=C3=B6rn =20 --Sig_/Jpiml1XtM/ZWA=YD.B.shWI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQQiGUP0np8nb5SZM4K/KGy2WT5f/QUCXQkN9wAKCRC/KGy2WT5f /e3dAJ4yXZ/NSF6YOcJic4qIDrinTzDWsACfRqQnJG7bYI0o1f17i6YqGFdCHfA= =88lm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Jpiml1XtM/ZWA=YD.B.shWI--