From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48343) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hH2gF-0004xe-UC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 04:46:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hH2gE-0001aj-QJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 04:46:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hH2gE-0001ac-N4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 04:46:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hH2gE-0004j3-Hi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 04:46:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#35304] [PATCH] gnu: gnunet: Update to 0.11.3 Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 08:45:08 +0000 From: ng0@n0.is Message-ID: <20190418084508.h4gaixppf77gtywp@uptimegirl> References: <20190417165223.o2dsvn2uzopumi4c@uptimegirl> <20190418044400.GX11051@sax.terramar.selidor.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190418044400.GX11051@sax.terramar.selidor.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer Cc: 35304@debbugs.gnu.org Ivan Vilata i Balaguer transcribed 569 bytes: > ng0@n0.is (2019-04-17 16:52:23 +0000) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > a few nitpicks (no idea if you have looked at my 0.11.0 > > update which was never applied). […] > > Thanks for reading the patch and for the comments, ng0! I started > working on the patch before you posted #34857 but I got delayed in > completing it and never checked back for other updates. Ah, I see. Okay :) > Probaby the best thing to do is drop this issue, and then I can start > from your patch in #34857 and also tackle the open questions that you > mentioned on my patch. For what it's worth I don't intend to continue working on my patch. The only reason why this isn't closed yet is because the gnurl patch in it hasn't been applied. I'll probably make a new release of gnurl in the next couple of days. I'm much more involved in pkgsrc these days, but if you have questions and need further feedback on gnunet related software feel free to reach out to me. I've spent my fair share of time untangling the dependencies and trying to make it very clear for good packagers to maintain their recipes (i.e., those who bother reading the ChangeLog we picked up again and at least the README). If something looks wrong or Guix needs additional notes, don't hessitate to mention it on the gnunet-developers@gnu.org list, we'll work it in somehow. > Cheers, > > -- > Ivan Vilata i Balaguer -- https://elvil.net/ Cheers, ng0