From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60565) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gthAn-0005kI-1T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:09:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gthAm-0003LJ-4a for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:09:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46131) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gthAl-0003J1-0N for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:09:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gthAk-0007Wx-GR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:09:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#34366] [PATCH] gnu: cryptsetup: Update to 2.0.6. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:08:43 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20190212230843.GB31074@jasmine.lan> References: <20190207111902.36bd0753@mykolab.com> <20190209102400.19d8fa94@mykolab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190209102400.19d8fa94@mykolab.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Rutger Helling Cc: 34366@debbugs.gnu.org --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 10:24:00AM +0100, Rutger Helling wrote: > I just tested reconfiguring and rebooting. Everything still works for > me, including the initramfs. >=20 > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:19:02 +0100 > Rutger Helling wrote: >=20 > > Hey Guix, > >=20 > > here's an update for cryptsetup. Note that although it seems to run > > fine I haven't been able to test it with an initramfs (yet). Thanks! Are you able to incorporate the changes suggested in to cryptsetup-static? Let us know either way. --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlxjUfsACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiF5BAArAKFCtzE4mCV8+4gz6jqX5moa3MOPqNCfI5pIFWVyleom8KCM5BvR/Ok 5NYOIP4vER3Pau3BEVZ1Xl4kiO2Gp3moE4L6ESvtyWjKG+CeYoAira9HZqnTpu4I uvvgXaBrd0BpIke39xqpaD2o04+PdokXyO1avExq9eIgQrECcIijlVKgwN0EiVrQ Wf9+SQ4BYcly8RjqFs6cW7IybBIaDeXdkdbNynHTYHrZJjkUKMV7uUvOMvfH9Jry eiDpGVAFAEFYS83MKEAFh5CsW7uZvz1IePXIf8oC/t3WpLh1W65L0U3bbxFCBsQp v2mPHEUCTL+IvfN54gHU2inMFINks/HQDudgih+r1qYwlN99+Cu92n8t6W7HCdyH roSNycmVXt5jEUiliTHysAZ559xqbF8XvOLRg7BfcKRPj+NNFLR7PMkeN/YKY4/k sasELeUon62PC6jpPhitv4IkLweM3PjFYB4T1yDwgHAhBa4xab1iEs6ZYeQn/7r9 LzE4ha64FFe0Gu00ZTtgcJjcA4FVOle3iRL61/Brgkw4VBTC7fxPfHJdlSklEO9+ /oyNdocnfhBLhQv4lz5jeT93dDN8T2omj6T8YunZed4MONHsUKlZ16XVeROtt0pL l8VMqNruX/d3i8JUlhCGcedKylnH5Qk9Dn8BAIethslPywX/A38= =0xCy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF--