From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghgzm-00019y-Ed for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:32:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghgzl-00035G-S6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:32:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ghgzi-00034C-Ue for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:32:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ghgzi-000081-CT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:32:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#33893] [PATCH v5 2/4] gnu: Add docker-engine. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:31:07 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20190110203107.GC14234@jasmine.lan> References: <20181230121754.775-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <20181230233903.23426-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <20181230233903.23426-3-dannym@scratchpost.org> <87pnt9y1v0.fsf@gnu.org> <20190107194455.69823f82@scratchpost.org> <87va2z1qxl.fsf@gnu.org> <20190110032210.1242af1f@scratchpost.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="96YOpH+ONegL0A3E" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190110032210.1242af1f@scratchpost.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 33893@debbugs.gnu.org --96YOpH+ONegL0A3E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 03:22:10AM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > Hi Ludo, > Hi Leo, >=20 > On Tue, 08 Jan 2019 09:42:14 +0100 > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >=20 > > > Go has peculiar ideas of how the directory layout is supposed to be s= et up. > > > I could probably figure it out - but if someone with more Go knowledg= e could > > > step forward it would be much faster. =20 > >=20 > > I see Leo is Cc=E2=80=99d so we=E2=80=99ll see. :-) Indeed, Go is very particular about this... > Nevermind, I've fixed it and learned something in the process: Okay, good :) Let me know if you have more Go questions. --96YOpH+ONegL0A3E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlw3q4oACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjkrhAA2KCK5RfxEfqHVXmGS/ux42HqzAqTALSIL16j7T77zq71vnufpipyQheK yJ0RltAbmIAUkK7e7vNqNWqypZvbNZtvUsqXIIVM/cYp9oPU9mdPV+uJqGEn8oqm 4I8cz1ac6wXefYqmre2UIAulBKPAEPefG6JdZHHDhtW5hqpocaPXIp8u+Fy4jI9R z/1l3oGn2co8odWGlwuMAmjTn2IvNUwp/aPQ5zXB++IXxwdofQnhYwZaGXeqpUaS zafsbnNxCU+Dk9iTNH6xXMaHUuui8gucY+iIj6mK5GmkcmDfNRrchIrbP+QYspyo fzVTAuXiRuxcyO/4shpnJS9KKZzgXxOqmXj4mw7DlEfELxQA7TF0XkJfGP7eynH3 fQahJkn5XhJm2mAUKO7v3DVI/DY/sNdYEw8h/41VgKmz4MPBX45wDzAKz9nsLrLf Z/Krz1Ox9uUmpudWajVdPQephw0Q+vyarv6+3g41TWx85oge0BPQj0d4ikiABCb7 BwCXC90NU9U2GdfFYMBU8zlE1gnboDoHezcEvFdr387ZMI95CPWeqFMGWJbtRIju eycKksDNt0687yAqHugzAVZYPUo6Qq4ClV+LlmlmL+UXR7PBpdtdyCivHvO3e0Jc xODNE+YsdQVg2t8JFC5ombz5bQhFHJvZkGwYKR4OAZmXkbmoxhQ= =AIAR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --96YOpH+ONegL0A3E--