From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37829) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNuMn-0005D5-QR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 01:46:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNuMk-0002V8-MV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 01:46:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNuMk-0002Uu-GQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 01:46:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gNuMk-0004Jv-D5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2018 01:46:02 -0500 Subject: bug#33284: [PATCH] python: Honor '--cores=...' in tests. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2018 00:45:15 -0600 From: Eric Bavier Message-ID: <20181117004515.1111b65a@centurylink.net> In-Reply-To: <87o9b2p56m.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <20181105202344.0cab8e1e@centurylink.net> <20181106085202.5e119586@centurylink.net> <87o9b2p56m.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/=MyQ0Sg3y5lEjUSMgdRgwY_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 33284-close@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/=MyQ0Sg3y5lEjUSMgdRgwY_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 17:00:01 +0100 Marius Bakke wrote: > Eric Bavier writes: >=20 > > Hello Mathieu, > > > > On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:07:47 +0900 > > Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > > =20 > >> Hi Eric, > >>=20 > >> Your patch seems go to me, even if I think the root cause of your prob= lem > >> is fixed by: > >>=20 > >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D33186#26 > >>=20 > >> I think that both could be applied to core-updates. =20 > > > > Thanks for the link; it looks like it should help. But, yes, I think > > both can be applied. =20 >=20 > Note that the broken test has already been removed on 'core-updates'. >=20 > Eric: can you push a 'python-updates' branch? I wonder if we have time > for a "half-rebuild" before the next 'core-updates' round; I've got some > other heavy-impact patches in my pipeline (Glib, Cairo, ++). >=20 > The patch LGTM. I've pushed this to the core-updates-next branch in commit 5b01b6034aeab32a5011c5757f18bd9772d3497d `~Eric --Sig_/=MyQ0Sg3y5lEjUSMgdRgwY_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoMXjUi7471xkzbfw/XPKxxnTJWYFAlvvuPsACgkQ/XPKxxnT JWbsqxAAgjJLrou6Yn5X7XI+PvKvOnvuBlY2TWCGA1Lz6L4lnQ43ZkVWlatCH1KR +fknDjt5+WjEPK80H7Jzb6xM8IRGADwTwipwuFBgOtLDLoD9TznQLZGeeJNz+U/c AQ9+vDLuzskZiGXy6bgkL13hG+l3X91T3ewzsK3RkX/vpL1sQQI1/UlgPEXHDmae To87NHug3XMv+FCfv+iF9vj69ZdXxZLEYQiFRjfQlObmFU4/4to0E8Eu3x8sf/5e zeeVzMZXvWPxk2qHmN4frEcKkhAMjaPUOJDUCy3O8kNDErMcMejPHXoHjq2hmhho sqbsnCPBcEFACDH7L/GicbmXuyKzCLt1B/QSrHpfnxIo3dWZ2kh3PjHMnXh6lwS6 mhB7K/hSPkE69ZL2LPnZCL+6gj4LvU7tS2BaNZUpRqXz7pY2tXfMtbH2j2SPncM+ /Wj9jwvW4WvHT18j1nyMkxlYVp0IiogzER1kFmNu+CbW6jFJ2o7WNhzvnj5d+mot /dgbhWst9WtORDjsdSFdYGOfNbEbBg7b4MxpK3oO2PnRKpe0Jdj4RyCqePZUss8A UitodlkYx1kvejnliFggwBbr6lb4oM16+iuui+aqqWtFayuoqd62FKOYi59c4yuw 1AVS0sBt7NDd/eWL5XivQGw4zsfrapLAA2ViLQvqxlkz9r5qAOg= =zhTU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/=MyQ0Sg3y5lEjUSMgdRgwY_--