From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40399) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gKCYr-0004CV-JL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 20:23:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gKCYl-000289-1z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 20:23:13 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gKCYg-0001lU-IO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 20:23:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gKCYg-0000Nd-DN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 20:23:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#33284] [PATCH] python: Honor '--cores=...' in tests. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 19:22:37 -0600 From: Eric Bavier Message-ID: <20181106192237.79683848@centurylink.net> In-Reply-To: <87o9b2p56m.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <20181105202344.0cab8e1e@centurylink.net> <20181106085202.5e119586@centurylink.net> <87o9b2p56m.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/rPLRv8euO0/RCM6d.aTxute"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 33284@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/rPLRv8euO0/RCM6d.aTxute Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 17:00:01 +0100 Marius Bakke wrote: > Eric Bavier writes: >=20 > > Hello Mathieu, > > > > On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:07:47 +0900 > > Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > > =20 > >> Hi Eric, > >>=20 > >> Your patch seems go to me, even if I think the root cause of your prob= lem > >> is fixed by: > >>=20 > >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D33186#26 > >>=20 > >> I think that both could be applied to core-updates. =20 > > > > Thanks for the link; it looks like it should help. But, yes, I think > > both can be applied. =20 >=20 > Note that the broken test has already been removed on 'core-updates'. >=20 > Eric: can you push a 'python-updates' branch? I wonder if we have time > for a "half-rebuild" before the next 'core-updates' round; I've got some > other heavy-impact patches in my pipeline (Glib, Cairo, ++). >=20 > The patch LGTM. Sure, I can push this to a new branch. Thanks for the review. `~Eric --Sig_/rPLRv8euO0/RCM6d.aTxute Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoMXjUi7471xkzbfw/XPKxxnTJWYFAlviPl0ACgkQ/XPKxxnT JWYIRw//WYeuFlU0WRoT95tKswY9qYKLGoMQhgxDNiXYn1OpvA4eh51NcUbZZB/w jxL8V+AzcXldY9IIc7J/lOI3V5L1/tUjRgAZTBuvF7nKrB03bhHHGCGR6iLbe+XI BAh91VrQ7O97NmoM+mSAzN7uexqd6HTJrWB6etAFgqmeEl0UV6Vzp2GsQoUMQTum i7oBSt2JMcU2oh2hxN00Ru5mrEn+Pbq98oTTQQ8O+JXDmUdlAcol2q07AfkPGY3d Bs4BiwijLenQZ5cO4yKtZzrif0UVhmaC4hduEFTWFIKwJoO8/ZH+pMlb9K7A/X59 xhpi/FyzoaN5DPz2333x2J55YLestsbtmZspRJ6f38THDJ7qQ+sCMs5eKiSFp3bZ Gc+zEfbgaBxNwSDCFbpn0A9qpnYa81QQtVJ9gKGZy9Wdxu5C3atatD3E9gLknLxj a99M8GGAJNp09XCKqrrue6guQ9nhmupGH3BLd16Fo23eGRy5mXs7wvmYFMn3arb6 Q3L9Dz/1wD1BF1lIpPdCagjiJttZAu3xHVmICzA+dN9lqCXdkKmDl2ZGZd62S3CF 2TtYa3hLGtCAYrcJ3+4eoBF4VPG7zr30nAvfSmzCahDDTkuyyhCJaLfUCNhV2ERl RwZb+wMLSVFIBOszgl6eqZ48ntXfImqW812sOYS3h83jKqr5qhw= =QG5E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/rPLRv8euO0/RCM6d.aTxute--