From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCXwd-00056U-Rg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:36:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCXwY-00031B-T5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:36:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gCXwY-000315-Ov for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:36:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gCXwY-0006D5-Lh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:36:02 -0400 Subject: bug#33011: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: guile2.0-guix: Fix build. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 17:35:02 -0500 From: Eric Bavier Message-ID: <20181016173502.3870e904@centurylink.net> In-Reply-To: <87efcsdx7x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <20181011015246.24964-2-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <87efcsdx7x.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/eAdyqMnnZoSSsceCm91WMG."; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Cc: 33011-done@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/eAdyqMnnZoSSsceCm91WMG. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:39:30 +0200 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Hello Eric, >=20 > ericbavier@centurylink.net skribis: >=20 > > From: Eric Bavier > > > > * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (guile2.0-gcrypt): New variable. > > * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile2.0-sqlite3): New variable. > > * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guile2.0-guix)[propagated-inputs= ]: Use > > them. =20 >=20 > LGTM, thanks! >=20 > As discussed on IRC, I still plan to remove support for Guile 2.0 > soonish, but in the meantime I think this patch doesn=E2=80=99t hurt. OK. Pushed in c8e3651a824bbc28915802265d9a5e7cc6405eea --Sig_/eAdyqMnnZoSSsceCm91WMG. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoMXjUi7471xkzbfw/XPKxxnTJWYFAlvGZ5YACgkQ/XPKxxnT JWaAiQ/9F5lmGhFIAFLY5hXk/OgXRxpQA4t1vjh6iV8ua12zQuo3eYXCqQS7tYFi m9Nc8wrxkfHJ98cOL1qCRo6G1YkIB7oynY1BwssXMjUgJoHHAgD1suI2ZKbmjwMQ cm1m/2UA84vgNgNEVdlu0RkE5/Df+u8y9sWlYpj8izwyYtVBIYpam9XVbZmhNDc9 iTGBWD0ndg5gIBIHvSzyqYv8Q69/1PrUPSN37GfvPY9AkNTyql8vrfwiUBd2b8yo a4aNoiN3dCVGqS/4wCZotjkuwc8cQScXiSnnN4dy+1B9RPbaV9qO7JrHcuXz6Owv GqPR/i70ZKYOVga2vIKBnYEN32Wpq+yLLgUUVT9o6pyHjPiw2PxhgdgUUhOPCOMb ypuEglezIfFwj222QgTis1oWE8nILKeMyXJx13g99uPCQhBWmCH77xvdiGPjBO4I PK93GB44LPD231bs0AU9tmYruO3gu4tMotMoak7eotm8EZUBEc6BDsncGHFopTo0 za5DGkDVycVIixJ8zDdb7xcuK+tA6OuWzVC2rNcEQtstuelsVwS66uhUwGLZSpMq qHtTCOk8NZ/OYg0BujJGJNXCX6iPEyDas4BqBkG09tXKNz0Aptk4AHxg4gdUoOJ8 4V57xgHwHNQHo5YUt1uuyHrwkwwyNXJjJgLKCsGl02DXymJyd1U= =yAia -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/eAdyqMnnZoSSsceCm91WMG.--