From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51292) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gC3kw-0005Bm-PB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:22:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gC3kv-0002wg-Vn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:22:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gC3kv-0002wY-S2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:22:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gC3kv-0000wK-Ng for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:22:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#33010] [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add guix-minimal. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 09:21:43 -0500 From: Eric Bavier Message-ID: <20181015092143.0ce224d4@centurylink.net> In-Reply-To: <87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20181011015246.24964-1-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <20181011015246.24964-3-ericbavier@centurylink.net> <87a7ngdx25.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/rCC4aGu6l_TG1D.vagBvLoW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Eric Bavier , 33010@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/rCC4aGu6l_TG1D.vagBvLoW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 14 Oct 2018 23:42:58 +0200 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Hi, >=20 > ericbavier@centurylink.net skribis: >=20 > > From: Eric Bavier > > > > * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-2.0.13): New variable. > > * gnu/packages/package-management.scm (guix)[arguments]: Adjust 'wrap-p= rogram' > > phase to handle "missing" inputs. > > (guix-minimal): New variable. =20 >=20 > What=E2=80=99s the intended use case? Is it to check that Guix compiles = against > an old Guile 2.0 and without optional dependencies? Right, to make sure that what we're advertising to the outside world as far as minimum dependencies will actually work. >=20 > I wonder whether we should add packages =E2=80=9Cjust=E2=80=9D for this, = especially > given that 2.0 support is reaching end-of-life and that 2.0.13 is pretty > old. This package would be updated as needed to reflect changes in Guix dependencies. `~Eric --Sig_/rCC4aGu6l_TG1D.vagBvLoW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoMXjUi7471xkzbfw/XPKxxnTJWYFAlvEoncACgkQ/XPKxxnT JWbVxg//ZqMLs5nKMkbuj2gm2pif3PxH1nvbFY7l8uHY9N+oI6+NEUyNHDLazl2m PO/CewNV65euW+y5tu7m6Bqme6DtoRWK6MDc6nFnfs1bhZA5owtvITIWki7gVaau l9nEmFv+VMfnICDSQzFy0qSKeHVr3QmXnue+O7wZG2PxJOKZ3aYzeuFMDRoYteud YySWaUnQ4ViBwjb99XCOn7tGrjACinJFs+YhDDfOlguCf4rbHwuw3ZgJ5RyrGDcd 6WU5q0V2s10mO8hQJ1Py2fHeKlpCnshmfxQNgWTvw5jcYKTOvrm+oqmxIqFYTbyy zWHY2H1dSip9CT/of89u8NTXcT25g6PFFx0kv5fQx9hcykQDSf+CLQ4yqgV5pnOb TqMD6lVoOujKVTuGmbRokZSsNK9sIdObGBAa66E4zt/kJ06RneO2eXS9Jet01Zza hfLZUK3908dr7oo724gOsYq89rVYatBA5TZJTKZ677jzQ+IKMVJA2Q8xBEW3UCCd QEuVB0ucNUya976dPAc0cnkGh8T6J934B7fRtGwsdTr/6HxNsYnn+JdwRAQbKf1G 3JoxBC6+1vFpATg7fVkpG2z2xtNea9HOqbax7eKCGlU/IhmpFeT8CNIHzyjGUriO qL6doWri1avTIoXFebpOFzDKbKG9dz55/S6rxH1yD1N3N3iR2OY= =yFvi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/rCC4aGu6l_TG1D.vagBvLoW--