From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46615) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAi05-00019b-1P for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:56:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAi01-0008Ig-QR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:56:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41313) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAi01-0008HX-LG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:56:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gAi01-0002Wp-JZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:56:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#32984] [PATCH] gnu: filtlong: update path in aux script. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:55:50 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20181011205550.GF7201@jasmine.lan> References: <20181008091741.31531-1-madalinionel.patrascu@mdc-berlin.de> <20181009162239.17415-1-madalinionel.patrascu@mdc-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iBwuxWUsK/REspAd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181009162239.17415-1-madalinionel.patrascu@mdc-berlin.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: pimi Cc: 32984@debbugs.gnu.org --iBwuxWUsK/REspAd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 06:22:39PM +0200, pimi wrote: > * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (filtlong)[extra scritps]: corrected > the loading path for the filtlong in the script read_info_histograms.sh. [...] > (lambda _ > (substitute* "scripts/read_info_histograms.sh" > (("awk") (which "gawk"))) > + (substitute* "scripts/read_info_histograms.sh" > + (("/../") "/../../../")) > #t))))) Can you add a code comment explaining the effect of this change? It's rather cryptic! :) --iBwuxWUsK/REspAd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlu/uNYACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhh6BAAsigRcAvjpZVDfxLVWsbYp4cruZdTIlUlBpTAl61K1bTfrpbHX5B53tKW 2BgjEUsMTXD4DU1QHuOxudgOdhCt4/FJHT+WP2PeJPzynmN5sBp7tmfElewTlHIy YfGb5WjONI8pbmsEgMxqI6IMGiyHiW66DRpm0YMvs3pLTqGKa+TIAPTlgOHkkAsP P71b7kSDMBnLfrdhEoxi9L6dSuAcCj/vG2+JvCyomuFpUymRi4D6+dZWx8bXVr8t sNhGiB5EJbrFq74w4SOG3dUPrQFMXvS09J1UnUP2N/ESqQRsJDfkmL/XzaqXXwBE amCsSRxCCS6bA+hBQlxMp4K4gac+/NMDin4J5uhGpC7aXDDWxisq1NKOSeAC4w0k ntYz48UIjP/qxzmoPBaQ7uNfzOUu+yiqjM6w6+JJG7kN+jL7qdfpkc+dEiIsf8s9 5PCqwXb/8kNoTWydCbVEqcs617XIy4UY70MAH7MMv463XiiDSlm3JKLT3NOZ4HCx c+VlzGKo4/AkcY2oFeuFYKdGQvNPHWLSnO21ePHy2tGpmCDWPAIAQfKocHVo14+y knWQ8EuJRQCorlxCqiBZGpgMSMTkAKnJziucV7TUS6OEi7Rn5baCdVPHmP6aEbna OwmZ32+5qDfapKYmBY8qL2RZXfWkWilXZlrH9PPloBvPhDWNBVs= =wQe2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iBwuxWUsK/REspAd--