From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48071) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fpELH-0007Zk-8s for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:01:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fpEL9-0000mL-MD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:01:11 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44811) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fpEL9-0000mF-GJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:01:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fpEL9-0005wt-4o for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 11:01:03 -0400 Subject: [bug#32332] Acknowledgement ([PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add hashcat.) Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 10:59:59 -0400 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20180813145959.GB30613@jasmine.lan> References: <20180731101435.27382-1-ambrevar@gmail.com> <877elbhfhu.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5I6of5zJg18YgZEa" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877elbhfhu.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 32332@debbugs.gnu.org --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 12:22:05PM +0200, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > I've packaged hashcat, hashcat-utils and hcxtools. >=20 > I don't have access to OpenCL-compatible hardware at the moment, so I > can't really test hashcat. Anyone? >=20 > Also I'm not so sure about hashcat-utils and hcxtools: the code quality > seems rather low at first glance. >=20 > hashcat-utils seems to be necessary, e.g. to convert pcap files to the > hccapx format used by hashcat. >=20 > aircrack-ng can used in stead of hcxtools. See > https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=3Dcracking_wpawpa2. >=20 > While the hashcat community recommends hcxtools, I am under the > impression that aircrack-ng is a much more polished tool suite. >=20 > What do you think? I think it's up to your judgement. We package software with a wide variety of quality. Unless there are known exploitable bugs in these packages, I think we should go ahead and add the packages. --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAltxnO8ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwg52Q/+MXXjm6CjthPVFMa2Tl31heQxz9WDBD5VtpSdKQgZSYv978SerzvS6sbi EQ5niOW+pXvp+/TcUnTV/2+PE+Cwdq1h9iU6GcPKVU3tPk8nu8b9QLWLJ6Y4OH2W cao4myKLNqXgRogblGRlXIfasgtRpvpLFJBgyOx1A2evhsSqjQPc4WH5MTBTrdhk f03A3bcwVZLZpowYfB4J9Xl3Z+nhpg/6ExjDyVoyNgi123uoaviEF7Eh2TlhCOUF 3E2iL3LUOpkZLao3qCHME0ED9stEirCj7IHzkrmPVsXzoVF1eBj1QUDRJhAT+cVS Pdap+gn44ggfsIE1j/4nK9mgSvNDHcqKQ2vJMwC9XnKuWEQaC10HPVLFWBeJctin TkrDkZFXLM8c4GVaGnd9zjwW43a5Pmt6FFiEUjl0di057NQprIBdaRR9eW9al2I3 9BB+8851BarulOrV5NCYhoOBd5i1NyEFjZdcwQOB4j0WRIJZ98CXFOworKpbFmp+ phJyqNf072ODtu1+tyGWrLW9wzC00JHFfS03KULvX1W3B7cqDbMaxYH+ndIUbi/8 PgMyhMonDHK4ZYPEynpf3LdXWAZyDzR/eoIHj3nF0+tY6jC4HNKxWr0BKr9Hgs3D Qkyy48jQ2s+guEzaWLafis7mlabjDjxVacU9PpSBrleIRdSA+MM= =PcWR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa--