From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0rhd-00036A-7Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:44:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0rha-00045k-EV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:44:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0rha-00045c-9G for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f0rha-0002a2-03 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 12:44:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#30960] [PATCH 0/4] Switch to font-build-system Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:43:17 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20180327164317.edslruvgqd56vhgm@abyayala> References: <20180327084914.19263-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <20180327090810.2mvgm23ra7m6mj35@abyayala> <20180327134721.5bgxmbnqpsjcthmb@abyayala> <20180327143028.mxshqym6xedvrjzp@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 30960@debbugs.gnu.org Arun Isaac transcribed 558 bytes: > > >> I tried building font-lato again on my machine, and it worked. I suspect > >> this problem you are facing is due to the __MACOSX folders in the zip > > > > Out of scope of this patchset, but: > > Those aren't really necessary in the use. Couldn't we just instruct the font-build-system > > to ignore and/or delete them? > > This problem is general to all zip archives. Therefore, I don't think > font-build-system is the place to delete them. This should probably go > into the unpack phase of the gnu-build-system, which is what handles > unpacking of all archives. WDYT? Okay, sounds good.