From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47019)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ez4TV-0004kb-SQ
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:58:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ez4TS-0003lm-Lq
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:58:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40203)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1ez4TS-0003lg-I4
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:58:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1ez4TS-0001OI-5f
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:58:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#30851] [PATCH] Add SuperCollider, related changes
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.30851.B30851.15217414325289@debbugs.gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:56:51 +0000
From: ng0 <ng0@n0.is>
Message-ID: <20180322175651.gltojjb5hjvn56kp@abyayala>
References: <87vadsdcfv.fsf@gmail.com> <87po3wgw4w.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20180322121506.ohvxgjkfxwtutrxq@abyayala> <87fu4sgl99.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <87fu4sgl99.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 30851@debbugs.gnu.org, ng0 <ng0@n0.is>

Ludovic Courtès transcribed 454 bytes:
> ng0 <ng0@n0.is> skribis:
> 
> > Ludovic Courtès transcribed 46 bytes:
> >> Hi Maxim,
> >> 
> >> Pushed, thanks!
> >> 
> >> Ludo’.
> >
> > Should we still split it into Qt and non-Qt then later on as I
> > wrote?
> 
> Oh sorry for overlooking that.

No problem.

> I think you’re right, yes.  That could be done either with a separate
> output or with a separate package, whichever is the most convenient.
> 
> Could you look into it, Maxim or ng0?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

Splitting is what works best here in my opinion. You could take a look at the
open patch for adding qtoctave. People who have to build the variant without
Qt don't have to pull in Qt only to throw it into an output they don't want.
-- 
A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
https://n0.is