From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41396) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evpoB-0001hq-Dz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:42:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evpoA-0006dI-Jq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:42:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51997) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evpoA-0006dA-Ft for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:42:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1evpoA-00035l-4x for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:42:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#30804] [PATCH] gnu: hop: Fix source hash. Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41251) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evpne-0001dy-3o for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:41:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evpnc-0006Tc-Uy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:41:30 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2001:470:cc92::1]:57596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1evpnc-0006TG-Iu for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:41:28 -0400 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 20:41:29 +0100 Message-Id: <20180313194129.6500-1-me@tobias.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 30804@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: kei@openmailbox.org * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (hop)[source]: Fix sha256 hash. --- Guix, Kei, Building hop fails with a hash mismatch. Here's what I get now, however: - I don't have a copy of the original tarball with which to compare. - The build now fails with ‘cc: command not found’, and I assume it didn't previously. Could you investigate? Kind regards, T G-R gnu/packages/scheme.scm | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/scheme.scm b/gnu/packages/scheme.scm index 657ca875d..9ec13dcb1 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/scheme.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/scheme.scm @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ Scheme and C programs and between Scheme and Java programs.") version ".tar.gz")) (sha256 (base32 - "09m7pahjsp7wxzd20cdph9j3mgf2nq5dyckcjljcd40m25v85kks")))) + "0bvq79vxcpgwydwi923cxb5w9isx2x8r3d0xndbdhacmmsw1m811")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (arguments `(#:test-target "test" -- 2.15.1