From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56174) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etJmf-0007JU-PC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 16:06:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etJmc-00065N-Ih for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 16:06:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1etJmc-00065I-F2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 16:06:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1etJmc-0004mL-7d for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2018 16:06:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30711] [PATCH 1/1] guix: graph: Add Trival Graph Format (TGF) backend. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 22:05:21 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Message-ID: <20180306220521.555dd2a6@alma-ubu> In-Reply-To: <8a311dbb-676e-17ee-79df-d0ab52c6f752@crazy-compilers.com> References: <20180305114136.7207-1-h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com> <87h8pu8msv.fsf@gnu.org> <87po4hxznk.fsf@gnu.org> <8a311dbb-676e-17ee-79df-d0ab52c6f752@crazy-compilers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/nqbkMcE_n=xbnx3j3g5At1d"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Hartmut Goebel Cc: 30711-close@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/nqbkMcE_n=xbnx3j3g5At1d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 21:20:48 +0100 Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'm retracting this patch. The implementation is wrong, fixing it > requires too many changes and the use is arguable. So we should not > spend much tome on it. >=20 > Thanks for reviewing and feedback :-) >=20 Do you think with gvpr one could write a dot2tgf? Here is the manual and an example: https://manpages.debian.org/testing/graphviz/gvpr.1.en.html https://gist.github.com/blabber/74b8d9ed59d0b2ad0d7a734113996424/ Bj=C3=B6rn --Sig_/nqbkMcE_n=xbnx3j3g5At1d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlqfApIACgkQvyhstlk+X/3w7ACgk+02Hi2Xdr6fHoxpRZXxlliT QCoAn3+iU1yhXbtEnN+E2LK2Zuc1zxBP =8PwQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/nqbkMcE_n=xbnx3j3g5At1d--