From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50661) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1erOgu-00010k-5l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:56:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1erOgk-0008Iy-Vx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:56:12 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1erOgk-0008Ij-SS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:56:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1erOgk-00006M-J8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:56:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30629] [PATCH 0/5] Detect missing modules in the initrd Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 14:55:28 +0100 From: Danny Milosavljevic Message-ID: <20180301145528.2411f36b@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: <87tvtz6hk4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180227141720.12513-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20180227222632.42bcf52c@scratchpost.org> <87tvu2w2vg.fsf@gnu.org> <20180227235027.00bc79b1@scratchpost.org> <20180301124655.72f6ca52@scratchpost.org> <87tvtz6hk4.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 30629@debbugs.gnu.org > Of course. What I was suggesting was to push =E2=80=9Cmy=E2=80=9D series= first, then > rebase =E2=80=9Cyours=E2=80=9D on top of it without the kmod bits since w= e=20 >can now do > without it. Do you plan to implement depmod in Guile?