From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38395) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epar3-0002Xo-TF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 09:31:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epaqt-0002jm-6R for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 09:31:13 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50389) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epaqs-0002j3-Ug for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 09:31:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1epaqs-0003ZG-DU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 09:31:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30469] [PATCH 0/1] Require Guile >= 2.0.14 Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:30:32 -0600 From: Eric Bavier Message-ID: <20180224083032.4f5f1e36@centurylink.net> In-Reply-To: <20180215152627.4695-1-ludo@gnu.org> References: <20180215152627.4695-1-ludo@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/duxHO6erT03F.XNoin4z=Zv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 30469@debbugs.gnu.org --Sig_/duxHO6erT03F.XNoin4z=Zv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:26:27 +0100 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hello Guix, >=20 > This patch is to require Guile >=3D 2.0.14, released one year ago, instead > of 2.0.9, released in 2013. >=20 > For the record, here=E2=80=99s the distro status: >=20 > =E2=80=A2 Debian unstable has 2.2: > . >=20 > =E2=80=A2 Older Debian versions have 2.0.13 (not .14): > . How much of this patch would change if it were to instead support 2.0.13? Is cutting off users of Debian stable a good idea? >=20 > =E2=80=A2 Parabola, Gentoo, Homebrew, openSUSE, Fedora 26+ have 2.0.14 = and/or > 2.2: . >=20 > I=E2=80=99d like to have this change in place for the next Guix release, = 0.14.1 > I presume. >=20 > I=E2=80=99d also like it to be the last release that support Guile 2.0. Same question. `~Eric --Sig_/duxHO6erT03F.XNoin4z=Zv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEoMXjUi7471xkzbfw/XPKxxnTJWYFAlqRdwgACgkQ/XPKxxnT JWZnWxAAmR5p2QTXRiNZWY/4sws0217C8l2549fp1JO3oWUvJDvuZlU2u1X4P07H EQG7TznJmjtvKiOCnt75zj0nVUTyL6uPcQgtYxaUVuPRP7eB5GIYaokHO+A1yYRK sIQm7bYpGvxysPUa1O/zVQmOBQW5NluaoznuKGB/Ql+bIcIdywG/mv9L2VFY7J88 P//cQXSijqh/u4xWkJHr4/djK9QUmK/wMks7CuRYCKR0kANlgRp7s8e4IVQxC2yy q0Xa3i4ZAYFEthTB1fSlXy3oXjJnPsxSSMwO8gJS/O7i0sq/jPwDYqyyx868+eDN mNR6BWlK13ctx4xkJ4QsLfPtxuniuToPzTXs88ZYECdcBITsycbMEV0PRc08xwvE Zfie528BzOAuJxtFVwFYXUoyLU4/ryk1MAo6Q+z699qucrUQ+4EgtyiAEUU4hnjA 5puoQyEWamCF7/yXTIxXwMx0oskE8zlWz0OXHMEk+I0Uw/xwOvXxPPV+HsJJ4wv+ MVYkfQZSUIW6bzt7EHF19HS3ELi7u9PdHuU3nL0KWtrSyUpn5lWKi0h5LOWVi75r ts17xw05eVDQDaRbe6vz3Z6gZHoPbv91f1x9zTRYSUt0nHLbke3F/kP5/TkUe9h4 ml5S1rug8bofRbFlPEbbNnQG2lrhvKyXwEq5GbGTBUil4w+yDzk= =tRa+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/duxHO6erT03F.XNoin4z=Zv--