From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38413) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epHCZ-0004w5-PV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:32:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epHCU-0003AE-QH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:32:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epHCU-00039I-JR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:32:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1epHCU-0007Aj-6V for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:32:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30411] [PATCH] gnu: ldc: Update to 1.7.0. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:31:07 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20180223173107.GA24390@jasmine.lan> References: <20180210141208.GA13051@thebird.nl> <20180218060944.7608-1-pjotr.public12@thebird.nl> <20180218133449.0273e0b3@scratchpost.org> <20180218214110.GB9488@thebird.nl> <20180220104720.2cc49871@scratchpost.org> <20180221012649.GA22636@thebird.nl> <20180222014230.GA28429@thebird.nl> <20180223125932.146ef945@scratchpost.org> <20180223171008.GA6186@thebird.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180223171008.GA6186@thebird.nl> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pjotr Prins Cc: 30411-done@debbugs.gnu.org --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 06:10:08PM +0100, Pjotr Prins wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:59:32PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > > Yeah, I've applied it to master with some small changes a few days > > ago. It builds and tests fine now. >=20 > Thanks! Does this mean it can go into the new Guix release? Yes. I don't know the maintainers' plans for the next release, but whatever is on the master branch now will be in the release, barring any surprises. > i686 and armhf failing on lit-tests looking for make. I'll > take a look when I have time in the coming days. >=20 > We should consider changing the name of ldc.scm to dlang.scm. There > are two other D compilers which are libre. Including a GNU one ;). At > the same time the packages could be re-indented. wdyt? Sure, patches welcome :) --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlqQT9cACgkQJkb6MLrK fwi9vQ/8CSM/KGXCGo+ght6NiwqUl/11PvShj3qlIvx2VjsmlvWMQtOmVl7x38sg V8mgoW/JhJSvDXDlG+LA/U4dQ1k8Gh7Nr0eijuuJtpEmEOKOpOx9O78f9xdbViWK tSqxuuJDJ4uLAYsvaRdPHfF6l4G/Truk3rBAYaYTk51g0uoO46aP2CS86xjW/lpL XjRQ+l36vXiLq6rzjBGowAIemPkandh9k4xiuxABphkjXzrIutOxRS/BTewirdYz lwwY/oyG1XauO7jAFQXmsBjJf3COiwgakFvWRAZufUoF019dpw+052rimqfhpFaO 9BDWrO5+zlUCVvvuVeuOKGq1kcxM+g9YSAvuvvGO8hj52xpu8EpWtR/jyJVPEp/v hoyicD0XqM4euNHdVo5YWYsCVyn/vVcsEVEEqa2+KG9r5LzNvYD2B2HI5feTYJGl UT15+WSVmy6dUlpO7N5ngYq8tQVuzsrqyEtiPhrN/O4UTIjKSkCvLM40AQ/Q33qq XJOdjJ7ng3N2vnpKSU9hktnEVjs0vt+Pk4n5F4BJRGL5aQTC31CecF5IGAOsjER+ 9Cr2li1FVlT3dE9ol0p3E4eabNEvm3cDUKf7BT5aawSVGLsVIYmB1NjoVNQ0cuQv gGRtimqpt814fwgxgt6FO2oQj8N6AfFsSnRkrQzxWYzPNEZl8QE= =hQ1e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--