From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epGw5-0003q1-Sx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:15:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epGw2-0008Kk-O5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:15:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epGw2-0008K5-Je for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:15:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1epGw2-0006mA-5X for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:15:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30411] [PATCH] gnu: ldc: Update to 1.7.0. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:10:08 +0100 From: Pjotr Prins Message-ID: <20180223171008.GA6186@thebird.nl> References: <20180210141208.GA13051@thebird.nl> <20180218060944.7608-1-pjotr.public12@thebird.nl> <20180218133449.0273e0b3@scratchpost.org> <20180218214110.GB9488@thebird.nl> <20180220104720.2cc49871@scratchpost.org> <20180221012649.GA22636@thebird.nl> <20180222014230.GA28429@thebird.nl> <20180223125932.146ef945@scratchpost.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180223125932.146ef945@scratchpost.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 30411-done@debbugs.gnu.org On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:59:32PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > Hi Pjotr, > > On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 02:42:30 +0100 > Pjotr Prins wrote: > > > If you think this patch looks OK, I can resubmit it. > > > > Again, I'll start chasing fixes with upstream. They are pretty > > receptive. > > Yeah, I've applied it to master with some small changes a few days > ago. It builds and tests fine now. Thanks! Does this mean it can go into the new Guix release? i686 and armhf failing on lit-tests looking for make. I'll take a look when I have time in the coming days. We should consider changing the name of ldc.scm to dlang.scm. There are two other D compilers which are libre. Including a GNU one ;). At the same time the packages could be re-indented. wdyt? Pj. --