From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41445) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXB7X-0002KZ-Kk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:24:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXB7S-0003iF-Rj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:24:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55554) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXB7S-0003i4-ON for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:24:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXB7S-0007O5-JT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:24:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 19:23:38 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20180104192338.gbdv4pefdbwzkaqf@abyayala> References: <20180104022157.27354-1-me@tobias.gr> <20180104025937.GA25138@jasmine.lan> <6a8f089c-e60e-c4ad-9ec3-e4a82afde605@tobias.gr> <20180104173422.GB6465@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tzohsiq6rat5i6di" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180104173422.GB6465@jasmine.lan> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 29973@debbugs.gnu.org --tzohsiq6rat5i6di Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari transcribed 1.6K bytes: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 03:54:28PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > > Leo, > >=20 > > Leo Famulari wrote on 04/01/18 at 03:59: > > >> While our Newsbeuter shouldn't be outright vulnerable (thanks to Leo= and > > >> Efraim), and newsbeuter.org might be only temporarily off-line, what= do > > >> we think about blessing its successor? Surely it's but a one-line pa= tch. > > > > > > I think it's a good idea! > >=20 > > Good to hear! Any chance there's a less silly way to make the change? >=20 > I'm not sure what's silly about it? Is there something that requires the > package definition to be moved? Oops. Nvm my last email. --=20 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys WWW: https://n0.is/a/ :: https://ea.n0.is --tzohsiq6rat5i6di Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlpOfzoACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYgqyw//QKCUutSP6xYJqp1ZpJHLf9+aoVW+0wdKWHACTozP2OSymC0ds6YiKDD2 /00GoNDY3w7+LZ5pO3E4BbwpIYCTR6GkAK0ZlaITdwUtrh1zw03nqah1uML1mKTQ qrGmZqzUbHIUNOYYaAUNNLr9SrsnwSs4aJ06nlU/WmsP7Ap6ScqIHVsdP2wYZleG sfM0/sHaEhXAgTG/SGz0YkwM8g9+SjoT2M2NYOjdSacahScrGTfuYlH7cnMLN8MD JJ2o0uKtGfgETI/BESfSbXgFkU6T2zyU9kCuRab/91tyW7BIzcLqF1/bOxRQdjP1 12ON732T9bPltOseB1ImrcSOPsPhO38z34asupBPT09dk07N6oECi/5UzafYC/J2 gYeqdSYHTgmTT7ASqk/kkfaP4g7zyfTFgbAz5eUrXuM4Rl92V9FPonn6XEMnI3DL 7KS83yXAs4n+aaQkSIMaB8wOD5o4rcKiFBmvrxe6dSusaS3TbW3qkwU/oWNQ0x9j 7jQzeJnMgnBmvPVIKosTDOG6qrDuXrbCssPwcichfKglr4Oe6za4wFVbg9KwQYWx F8oNjJ7+E7Z8K+tyqagBIJQLpbC6v/C2s9zcWij7FlTW5sEOPnZwsRGqR4ncx2t5 WIK8RdlurdafpHo1779oVkAwWY7vvA3Mtd6b7Z198wis96pMzTc= =uBTS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tzohsiq6rat5i6di--