From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXB7X-0002KR-JW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:24:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXB7S-0003hb-Gv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:24:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXB7S-0003hL-Cv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:24:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXB7S-0007Ny-2L for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:24:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 19:22:53 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20180104192253.svadno3qvhsvoq57@abyayala> References: <20180104022157.27354-1-me@tobias.gr> <20180104025937.GA25138@jasmine.lan> <6a8f089c-e60e-c4ad-9ec3-e4a82afde605@tobias.gr> <20180104173422.GB6465@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jdmky5ybtqejvi2s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180104173422.GB6465@jasmine.lan> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 29973@debbugs.gnu.org --jdmky5ybtqejvi2s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari transcribed 1.6K bytes: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 03:54:28PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > > Leo, > >=20 > > Leo Famulari wrote on 04/01/18 at 03:59: > > >> While our Newsbeuter shouldn't be outright vulnerable (thanks to Leo= and > > >> Efraim), and newsbeuter.org might be only temporarily off-line, what= do > > >> we think about blessing its successor? Surely it's but a one-line pa= tch. > > > > > > I think it's a good idea! > >=20 > > Good to hear! Any chance there's a less silly way to make the change? >=20 > I'm not sure what's silly about it? Is there something that requires the > package definition to be moved? Can't we use the package property superseded? That's how I imagined 'supers= eded' would work. What you are doing is dropping it as far as I remember the first email. --=20 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys WWW: https://n0.is/a/ :: https://ea.n0.is --jdmky5ybtqejvi2s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlpOfw0ACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYjeWw//XxevBsOTa0eNcWZKWl3Ypvc3BhnLxMwpwRcdK2aDsuDefFfsoLD+1tlo H+rK2QrMLsSsGYgztmHE7+nsF5aoK3yPDghp1X9Evo7BoQFDL/WrAsNUIukM6O4e oI+2qV2a9XZC4Q4ORgabe24tudhcemWUVa2ic7IPsSXaJjKGgo8pUaAkgLGjk08A v4c/L3Z01u7ojDTKrrMmZ6J7PXcOzG6t2uIpxHcdLLEo4nL8DLo0JFl0m5r6Yj4H GjH9QqlfNZhh0mDjgQZmsYEV0CdxAhui6UIxe8+BZdXIZaxsZ9ZcV3GGXLqCBscf WFfLpJ1ucYLDwVuDGdYYOruQwv2v93kdkNkVaiVJn4wX1MjNUk3Q0TIkrWd0DyhM 1h1ztdMq9TSTKcO8+gPi8yA9QM2M7EyvkQKIgrLZ1K0Vvr5jLPcg2l/2EmurooUa /zuVXqt3ZWMLf+s9ksojWlRgM0RrYTaFEF98U31OwUAuq+05mHrmnKXUmikavcv8 gUxRRsN4cGndhKxepbXAq1dVwhbzxBcFoK29E9BROzJef8/7PxpIdLs2ddSeRMvX MVDhHGoKMshWLg0Sq+SK10poeIUBOUG2l/KNOwEU2Ul6pD7yMKwCDmAZeeSPOvi7 9dJt8mmD3W95TSWMPkzkgpV0r/rGvvX1UYtYokNnr7HagnxMnRo= =PiwQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jdmky5ybtqejvi2s--