From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRKt8-0005Vo-Kv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:37:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRKt4-0002Vc-2q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:37:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33842) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRKt3-0002VJ-S4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:37:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRKt3-0007LB-KZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:37:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#29457] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-org-contrib: Fix sha256 checksum due to emacs-org update. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:36:19 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20171219163619.GC32288@jasmine.lan> References: <20171126170755.10891-1-clement@lassieur.org> <87wp2cu1o2.fsf@gnu.org> <20171126223521.GA17517@jasmine.lan> <87a7z7f7hn.fsf@lassieur.org> <87induqqwq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87wp1utzyz.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wp1utzyz.fsf@lassieur.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Cc: 29457@debbugs.gnu.org --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 03:33:08PM +0100, Cl=E9ment Lassieur wrote: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > > But wouldn't it make more sense, in this case, to merge both packages > > and let "contrib" be an output for emacs-org? >=20 > Indeed, to me it makes sense, but Leo knows much more than me about > packages, so I cc'ed him. I think it's a matter of taste, depending on the package. I'm not familiar with the Emacs packages, so I leave it up to you Emacs users :) --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlo5QAMACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhPXw/9FYip4lt0E7p2/vwMBrGyq762lXN1QvMJW65TWd5klttO1nm7vIFRPEJ2 F74vS9koARwF+DFjJns37Q7pUSIvgtGvCwdh2Gq2/M6roytyuLEXylT++SOBWsKh 5m8YBIcNkWUKTzTaiLkexuvtIFbkGcL2rbAUTcz/phTRd0SS/eznvodqLE9/Yjb7 FiY0W83bqramZWLgPR/rMC/TvtjnQNAxghi7HKIQZjqyM6Ij5JiGIiMWhkoVbKju yP+pgfSJSTOH/og8FoafFlE4hRghxMMw38VqbfOKbpcZIHGKt8zqZm24ykZZrbkI eJ5yMNLBbqv02Pi6KAIBmRAAgBhAPmhYrltzF3O/IOG+uzh5CXtlyri20MxShwOo UloWHS77OdTEL/w8a3ULWlf0sEs2qsmG47fM/dkbM2a+NpBkgRC4OzKrTsvXj0+q 3mzON06pU7/C6nGm/P8LrSoB+Vwf7hgunkPwnFZdGf6924KeWZg7mU08+ShmFi8h JJNOzJym2LSqHJ3VShHfbjmHuX8kRgX1oaJasBjp/elc3NhtccgayyGGf27hRhQ1 5qffN/TushSXX1GwzW9vsyCL2Q8VSHIBcmq6m9n5ume14ogT34MhPLmjf9hjqJyf T3s9W+PQfPq1nmodIVxSALXH0NTZQ/o4YuB9kioG1/Y29X5ULpM= =zPS6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GRPZ8SYKNexpdSJ7--