From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eMe73-0005cY-HY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:08:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eMe70-0004XW-A3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:08:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40692) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eMe70-0004XE-1A for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:08:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eMe6z-0005KY-OO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 13:08:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#29542] rng-tools: New upstream location, new releases Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 13:07:42 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20171206180742.GA2612@jasmine.lan> References: <20171203003126.GA353@jasmine.lan> <20171204184558.GF30970@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171204184558.GF30970@jasmine.lan> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 29542@debbugs.gnu.org --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:45:58PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 08:49:09PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > > Hm. Looks legit, no? >=20 > I think so but one can never be sure :) I dug around a bit. Fedora uses Neil Horman's fork from GitHub (what this patch changes our source to): https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/rng-tools.git/tree/rng-tools.spec?i= d=3D2aa45beb753b7401fedcbfa3ccd0a4b005510f56#n10 CentOS fetches from SourceForge with patches by Neil Horman: https://centos.pkgs.org/7/centos-x86_64/rng-tools-5-11.el7.x86_64.rpm.html Debian uses their own fork that hasn't been touched in 6 years: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/hmh/rng-tools.git/tree/debian/control= ?id=3D0235fcf189220aeecc657295b7d3fdd752d3254e Arch fetches from the old SourceForge project: https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=3Dpa= ckages/rng-tools&id=3D03d210e8ba320849fd19352174a1b082f4ab2b4f#n10 I don't know how to find package sources on SUSE's web page. So, I'm confident this source is okay. But after more reading, I don't think we'll need to use rngd after all. --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlooMe0ACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiIKRAArXPlRi8n4Jx5SsGbGCPMaxBKywHq4NknM1ngU4I6FlRsm7TUjv2Esqx6 nfyBqLLfExlF+e0sewEnYjHjd62CyBUj1ZKQ6mkq/Yfu64qnNimtsS0rUSjhu9dx lORNbBM3Di8/z6U/S2ywTTuwswTDGuUMQMDNfpjAk36QWWJYSomhloafxV3dSuqd N3iJqXTm8WsVdB7GsVP9Xlqsp+04FBxJ/p4/GHed8L1A3EvAHbvWdmTXM1FwIvE0 PrO0KP8DQPKyVQzZlkRp1M/b+BcXj7heptRupzl+Y3q1YKZBi6ZR+DY0VmzeaF7L wyhODcphAlXFn4xSvPwILKhrZIuhylPtvvbGuIpG8RSqriiV+o1W1A4U7Uz1VeGN 0ZCcxI/8fw3cxfziZXVWtY/MWdEdjRZpevG7DmiUQa/ABHSbkkhypAv6vATseSyD LxnTtJy4aBQiR0cODTUrpU03djJNO0f+12ruZJnpPymbYH0lS1uOP0l8z5VoQ+td MXl1SP7XPoymzgVaxKGF36XRgC6bAdSHwrsQBe7o9SAAvfvjzA1qebW5TcxDdFo/ KCB64VgP+dWWzC7GcMtndfQBQ09AeNe/sQWYTDKO641mzudSoTcVlAr654gu/oFa /uyCYlXujE6GW2xUpSGHNPZKFa+VtHm+ptyak3U8IDOj+mYG798= =CJJc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--