From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJnel-0003lk-BG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:43:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJneg-0002PR-Hq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:43:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54776) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJneg-0002PD-Dh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:43:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJnef-0005pu-Uc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:43:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29406] [PATCH core-updates]: Add selected upstream fixes for glibc 2.26. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:42:04 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20171128214204.GC16214@jasmine.lan> References: <87mv3eove6.fsf@fastmail.com> <20171123145702.GA5794@jasmine.lan> <20171127213004.GA22910@jasmine.lan> <87bmjnyyaa.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ski3cmj.fsf@gnu.org> <878teqzhpa.fsf@fastmail.com> <87r2sixueu.fsf@gnu.org> <87609uz5ln.fsf@fastmail.com> <87lgiqrub7.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="96YOpH+ONegL0A3E" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lgiqrub7.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 29406-done@debbugs.gnu.org --96YOpH+ONegL0A3E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:02:04PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Marius Bakke skribis: >=20 > > Typical: The 2.26 branch just got 10 new commits that look important: > > > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=3Dglibc.git;a=3Dshortlog;h=3Drefs/heads/r= elease/2.26/master > > > > Especially the malloc() fixes. Should we pick them while we still have > > time, or update the snapshot? >=20 > Your call! :-) >=20 > Maybe we can focus on building more on the branch, and revisit this > issue when we=E2=80=99re ready to build the whole branch. (Or are we rea= dy > yet?) >=20 > WDYT? I think there's not much to do without at least some of the glibc patches, because icu4c fails to build. I think we should take all the glibc patches, try building core, then everything. --96YOpH+ONegL0A3E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlod2CwACgkQJkb6MLrK fwjoBA//TQ0m5X4nNmEvZkNYEgIZySMfJRgkGQm6YtIcRkDC2hKJc+wf4dJ8TrSE Xa1deBc6ihkSUz5mFaYDTeWMSLiIMKzvh6V4EYo86HnteFRoG7OsUCMxnWRmiYjl SGSXjEsMhjTFZpjO05XhZFT+2XyX8kk0QWsEsyH1XuWKi3aD8Pkfvz4/5KnUFkAl Umlb77IxsR4YWDC3YnfFYYKN9Olw+cOfEoJjkkdsv1Ng/BwcrZxAAUU22T/tnJ3H 5GJQQU+1AwqON2pSYfFVNW19Wi/muV1fbzlt/MHO3c8XDjNosvJ1rKvNA6GlKf/K x2ARvEvVXDzf8aj/w6PvNv8ioXHhJVrNA7JY/ghl3RqvsrXINCPPIYJEpJqAzZDt prJPa7TxipFuGuLfjbrTAU7uGga/I97JQmqF4QOn+O8I/Dk4jLB8eEcR3Axmx3e/ I3ImkJKCIK/Cm+eaw7YI+vTfSHPXEe05RjwUbzwogR/GHxL/o5pma8cVCqm8iO0k emR6kkGvUqfRJf3HfkuMN6+2zmqSCRjODWgIpQ02aVis5ympIu33pGP1U8Ljxua+ ny7yqBv9yKNGDsFaWt843U4dIu4LHwFZ+HVsDHKlOvGemxCez9OunJNCgKQDRpYd eZKLbrYHB3GwvClSMRT83jEvq98A6eDrbpK1Lxei85ZW3QQTlbA= =5/XU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --96YOpH+ONegL0A3E--