From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJnat-0002fs-Hx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:39:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJnao-0000N8-Kp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:39:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJnao-0000Mw-G0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:39:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJnao-0005jG-60 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:39:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29392] [PATCH 00/11] Add scons build system Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 16:38:28 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20171128213828.GB16214@jasmine.lan> References: <20171128170651.6136-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171128170651.6136-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 29392@debbugs.gnu.org --Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:36:40PM +0530, Arun Isaac wrote: > Here is a new patchset with all suggested changes incorporated. Thanks! > For mongodb, I have passed "-g0" to scons using "CXXFLAGS=-g0". Now, the build > seems to progress farther, but I still run out of memory. Could you test the > package on your machine? I let the build directory grow to 22 GiB before cancelling the build (it's using lots of storage, but not much RAM). It worked previously, both before I tested your scons-build-system and using the previous revision of these patches. So, I think it doesn't matter whether or not we pass -g0. --Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlod11MACgkQJkb6MLrK fwhL/Q/+IbKbUMy6YT6KspRY0ksTEJKz4Jczax7at3T89KIZiEr76V70GfldxoFL 4ZRcJppHEMQ3jSHMMTJ6kINTxRqfjt4sIktgTV4Opfh1kWXUDhhFD1IhnjrwH4c5 ZVUgloTUONa2ElmCDM9fh3Fdvxzqc2M5u5Y+HudH2WmQcDPP7NCvi5NA3xjtamxV fctHhBfj4PyjNpxgN+CNsuNzktDIwUIwuRmD/I4psrb64F2JJJcW6ikkBs7Aa+y5 NqbkhQsfQbOkAgzJgcVOXoRH9gaf0AP/ZA0XUb9ByQIVTjstptGcrjWLoOib4jJA 6nd3j83hUKLCozvn98WGhfkw9fZrMiMneXgQAX5XxRYjnaXXTUjG/Y+cgaV2BiMN +bkAU/f7Zf+6bJQt0b+11nw9RzU5xAQ1B8cd8kmWndJXq6MtSQAZYuc40q61gE4Q VID4YuXuFA8vzGJt+Zc0E2IZCR7kwWXGoWKZy0muj0J03hOS9PcJzCrPn5ejehAO 6QshstOtlK/WGULZK8uWgCydX2Sc3W0Z4imKEG7j6oEaggnVKumYtoCHAepgQ6FZ ++ZN23J0ddnK7nZMfjTHTov+HFn4M0AmVT12ketmAjb0Y7WK3RfDd8FYd3zn3e/y qf7IxwmoGKUNv/mMKF4wjlAhCZL9G8tNnOT4xkJ/QJL9XuVReHE= =u8UC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Fba/0zbH8Xs+Fj9o--