From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40144) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJQzd-0007k9-Cl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:31:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJQzY-0000x3-Ba for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:31:09 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJQzY-0000wt-2S for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:31:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJQzX-0001T3-JX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:31:03 -0500 Subject: [bug#29406] [PATCH core-updates]: Add selected upstream fixes for glibc 2.26. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:30:04 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20171127213004.GA22910@jasmine.lan> References: <87mv3eove6.fsf@fastmail.com> <20171123145702.GA5794@jasmine.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171123145702.GA5794@jasmine.lan> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 29406@debbugs.gnu.org --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:57:02AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:28:49PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote: > > So I wonder if we should simply pick everything from this branch, > > instead of only the few that fixes immediately visible problems. > > Thoughts? >=20 > Based on this discussion [0], I think we should take the whole branch. > It sounds like commits on the release branches are considered important > bug fixes and "stable". So after reading the rest of that thread, I'm not so sure we should take the whole branch. They use the word "stable" to refer to the ABI, but the branch itself is not tested to the same degree as the tarball releases, and may even be in an incomplete state, depending on WIP commits. On IRC Marius said that at least one thing mentioned as "incomplete" in that thread has been completed on the branch. Anyways, I don't have a strong opinion anymore about which commits to take. But, let's make a choice and continue with core-updates :) > [0] > https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-09/msg01134.html --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlocg9gACgkQJkb6MLrK fwg7HRAAonQ9HZ0Fh0pvH46inFQtFTtBHpT9jZkOBL81wRrlOMFw3bipDYB/LVI7 qjzzuJ+NJNn9s+115gSiIS4LDOBl9ZISQVmtW4Mix8Db3opq7yS6rvURrFUNyRPP VHEkyOxxF1lgln3QqSzMi1E6CdKPkF6fKsdYKz1fU855kBEAY7rYD80B2SxQqKph wZFbwHYNgkoivFmriruBgg2UxA8a1Lp/ArGfdezgLSm+lBH8eNQpyWvemCy8Mh4V CS02oUhn2bueMll6gz5wZNmHWi/QHSD9fm/qRREmr+p+dndubY8U5po042cpE9Hz Puu8R88QdyR/bK+fUz2Wzz+wl+uOkQfIUpMlNKBMt9ln0kmEdfj34Alf11lFIcyi eFtYoSd49cWPu9t7nHp/2wmugIZJG3wO+Ld/E2a8i87PehZ7SKzqoK16maxNdKJd cj4h/lFvpbFFm0zwSSDypUoS5i6UbbgS+ZLlBP4dhkDEGNJHNYH4U89bVwXanVSi xOOkiv7p7hI5M1KQTG9xnF8t4HuTyKh+xFcJP5Rg7BG7g4rCpmSXgsdqxS+zOaaP O3FHkJWazO+2CNr+b/OOZQOJFbogxSofMatzUVbteBnkiBH8cdYHBrJnKVxWv6Cq odKDL7sPlLseAxHqyL0esN30hMh0Jth9b/M9s6WR3snXYLnWDq4= =gZwj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT--