From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52375) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJ2Y6-0001lk-4L for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:25:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJ2Y2-0002gI-Vv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:25:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJ2Y2-0002gD-SZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:25:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJ2Y2-0003Ka-Gf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:25:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29449] [PATCH] gnu: node: Update to 8.9.1. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 14:24:05 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20171126192405.GA1313@jasmine.lan> References: <877eudg6d7.fsf@gnu.org> <87zi79ueck.fsf@gnu.org> <87po84dfeq.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87po84dfeq.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Mike Gerwitz Cc: 29449@debbugs.gnu.org --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 02:10:53PM -0500, Mike Gerwitz wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 18:41:47 +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > The =E2=80=98check=E2=80=99 phase fails for me (on x86_64): > [...] > > Any ideas? Could it be a non-deterministic issue? >=20 > I'm inclined to think so...I just re-ran that test in one of the build > environments I still had in /tmp and it failed with the same error...! >=20 > I feel like this is a question that might have an easy answer, but: how > do I force Guix to re-build the package? I've tried `./pre-inst-env > guix build --check' and `--rounds=3D2' and such but it keeps returning the > current derivation without doing any actual work. --check and --rounds are a bit confusing when the package in question is grafted. Basically, grafting is treated as its own derivation, so doing `./pre-inst-env guix build --check node` just re-does the grafting derivation, instead of rebuilding node. Currently every package is grafted because we used a graft to fix a bug in glibc. So, try `./pre-inst-env guix build --no-grafts --check node`. --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlobFNUACgkQJkb6MLrK fwiepA//eZFfrS/3F89k0yaAgqjV3dsU1G/2ITOApzHKJZ9daifA/GrBgkcgo5PW UMo7rd4fWs/e4njsTZn2NyPDhNC1OH2dQynogz1i7sni4mHJY2kyWuqhjAoIbSyq 4C70632PpQbBe5pA+FmBNjursyKGZ3iAEMazpf8iycNSaH1pmUJIWPGz7rXMiFvx iSOBB+cozRzeHO61adYQ256dU6dAvXqG18YH8S6wQBNSw380DDiay/IdF9ejL9Dx 4EftMMOze5JxCR8xasG+2FAGonhUBERHxkD+FOE6080avsk9DBOCzy0PDqUyU0/V akAJPlSCl5hTLaWaBZ8AZK4fRAtKCayrnHHWW7ssuvmS62gCcrdyta2Rw8zMStn8 BqqGG2pBlffWKY1SriNGebZaModKtL+vFHRzzNH23TXFdNep0g1tJ4uuGXwvdzgL zPFrpuYjeUDnHMMEiy2LtDNfX+I+GRXsnCyJJy97nSkw5DS8VmOXEWQ6LtmbAfM8 u5bEgiA8SmZ+ESm1EObVwZjIJ6656KdLHgmbVV0DybS6VDm/CDcT5jz/hsH8RKRp L0Xj7swqLq6pHgDRUiGcx2cj7Sl9iPnHN6GviCvkKirExgPiIE9Zbwm/xW0HPPtX Mg24oPiE/KmpOWIM3Yeh7V5IKoXlOlMuYXKD0h85yzc6p3V7C/4= =2uWA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--