From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHt1y-0007dN-2X for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:03:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHt1s-0006MS-Bi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:03:10 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHt1s-0006MG-7d for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:03:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eHt1q-0005X8-0K for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:03:03 -0500 Subject: [bug#29408] [PATCH] gnu: python-pyopenssl: Update to 17.4.0. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:02:47 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20171123150247.GC5794@jasmine.lan> References: <68fe206e0ad7c88c1ae5324572858337@mykolab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <68fe206e0ad7c88c1ae5324572858337@mykolab.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Rutger Helling Cc: 29408@debbugs.gnu.org --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:37:47AM +0100, Rutger Helling wrote: > I think I'd like to withdraw this patch for now. It breaks gajim which > doesn't bode well for other dependent packages.=20 >=20 > Either that or I can rewrite it to add a python-pyopenssl@17.3.0 package > for broken packages. Thanks for checking. I also like to check the impact on 'certbot' when updating this package. Can you say how it breaks Gajim? Can you find any discussion in the pyopenssl or Gajim bug trackers? --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAloW4xcACgkQJkb6MLrK fwizBxAApH/ZUy1bbx015uuLtPOr4w77jAWquyTED1pVhoikIV+Zf856Q1n9GIB9 hPazheq64u5kJhFr8n5xkHhGaHIK1CgdwcHNcg0n9q734UYTGVVs6u6DanDGIvSG RSHWqefKBHZodrN0aWPgykSDd5qxKhyR3gh+vzm7+/W5Z2rxZg7oHR/cV3AKs24Z tCiFu1geD8IwH+qT09EG/iDPMy+zQN62XBTtB63j2MbTtrK3io2GqJrywRJaxoHf Vcg7afLWVoApGUPdnMH10OQ+sxdOrevgkJqmQgNqTjrZ/5te2gBz2suj0pB2z4eV vR59WXqSQayGK6lcRUzytvjHIrbXh2Bzz+c2OQQQa8bkuSR/srRRLvkN5O8TX5cb GJtYQDp9/wgLK+YfFJ6sHflDzAQyjRy2+S7dDMVRjQKighl8ycE8AJ7EQ5C5X7yI 8+oYaxc9Db2BlVG8HJdaVdMIi5Irz0kaLkO4SEWhj8+OlGUIYSnczzl+1c0bkBRg LJ2zIKTApiwBaKwAIrYxTiH8jI1AVSkLatWHlrv6wULwEyGIXrnsjdEZGZqxw/YT UoALbdtkd1s2eaFSZfxyJsOc0qYbOsbr6xuSw9TcdubXZ0horFb4t0PM+mSjeIcE PyinQHxuTpNf3r1mJn0tiGSCWUpaKQ+6f6ILLHbv3q6FvmzOuuQ= =LPGu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --w7PDEPdKQumQfZlR--