From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57612) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eG6yL-0001Jq-TD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:32:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eG6yI-0004Zs-QB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:32:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eG6yI-0004Zn-Gy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:32:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eG6yI-0005rx-7F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:32:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29253] [PATCH] gnu: libreoffice: Update to 5.3.7.2 and enable GTK3. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:31:08 -0500 From: Leo Famulari Message-ID: <20171118173108.GA23972@jasmine.lan> References: <87inehfdtc.fsf@fastmail.com> <3691d1f2161a73dce02fe9b6f5135d6a@mykolab.com> <20171114054129.GA6797@jasmine.lan> <583e996ae61cdcb1fde228d45327bb19@mykolab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <583e996ae61cdcb1fde228d45327bb19@mykolab.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Rutger Helling Cc: 29253-done@debbugs.gnu.org --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 08:16:06AM +0100, Rutger Helling wrote: > Hey Leo,=20 >=20 > The only benefit would be that you'd give someone the option of picking > GTK2 if someone preferred the GTK2 look-and-feel. Then again it would be > trivial to restore this, or write a libreoffice-gtk2 package. So it's > probably better to remove it.=20 Okay, I pushed the change as 42ca84be9260d6a1ce12847b89545882b112a2cd. --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAloQblwACgkQJkb6MLrK fwj0rg//VgpVc9qD4xZSZZHSFVP0MhWdXWvsHqAdp7MY4kiozNcRQZ1u0IrxMOKi hmNiCvnC65QdlgbzlSCCj4R5uoMPjX3YXz7Pswjw4Q9kwh3tZBg11JUi3nBncuxN fB+TvltXeGJ/9A3znGMeEBj6Vib5A5nSuP2zFSaGWUMeCYcopSTh5APVFeR0/idC WeKWdQ26ZhIBxN65BOmejeKpLp+pbfv9NV7zZc81w40V/L6uLAayUSrSTGj1j86V 3q/wgqGqyI1fvkjV39g8HYhTJO7VPI7/Rn24su7l5UJNb5h0HZBm8UZpubVejPj1 wQP9bxaQvSeldkOM+YgqoCR39IlQMzQNLhRXGDVidmt7fvl6WCmllQ7uXJ11MssH nzNQY4cem8dp9MnnRCQB3fITSYbrZST1ck8OGRbQs2WL6AJA5MOe1nUDx4QeV5fE lklZSDETCdCImIvHEGWxxosVkca1qa7kU5cKmvL+ejtcl0serj1FKmtH5sw2ksUg jaL1Qc44bTt7vXDVKJXehHR/COzYQv/cvG3t97zCz+ZiDtiMsbP1//+rDZdfXU6X FDgkidl/BbJPvQqsys/jVR04/J/GOeqhnKNDsc7mls6xuEaDep2zVQcMG4EpZox3 7tuEyob1LUB171XM+o1VJtru3NnLT1dnpnewHgj/926/T6uPfTU= =TysY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--