On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 20:00:37 +0000 ng0 wrote: > Christopher Baines transcribed 5.4K bytes: > > On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:23:19 +0000 > > ng0 wrote: > > > > > Christopher Baines transcribed 4.7K bytes: > > > > On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 18:47:37 +0000 > > > > ng0 wrote: > > > > > > > > > * gnu/packages/fontutils.scm (nototools): New variable. > > > > > --- > > > > > gnu/packages/fontutils.scm | 44 > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 43 > > > > > insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/fontutils.scm > > > > > b/gnu/packages/fontutils.scm index 15401f652..ca10c10b0 100644 > > > > > --- a/gnu/packages/fontutils.scm > > > > > +++ b/gnu/packages/fontutils.scm > > > > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > > > > > ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017 Efraim Flashner > > > > > ;;; Copyright © 2017 Rene Saavedra > > > > > ;;; Copyright © 2017 Leo Famulari > > > > > +;;; Copyright © 2017 ng0 > > > > > ;;; > > > > > ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix. > > > > > ;;; > > > > > @@ -44,7 +45,8 @@ > > > > > #:use-module (guix svn-download) > > > > > #:use-module (guix git-download) > > > > > #:use-module (guix build-system cmake) > > > > > - #:use-module (guix build-system gnu)) > > > > > + #:use-module (guix build-system gnu) > > > > > + #:use-module (guix build-system python)) > > > > > > > > > > (define-public freetype > > > > > (package > > > > > @@ -565,3 +567,43 @@ opentype fonts. You can save fonts in many > > > > > different outline formats, and generate bitmaps.") > > > > > (license license:gpl3+) > > > > > (home-page "https://fontforge.github.io/en-US/"))) > > > > > + > > > > > +(define-public nototools > > > > > + (package > > > > > + (name "nototools") > > > > > + (version "20170925") > > > > > + (source > > > > > + (origin > > > > > + (method url-fetch) > > > > > + (uri (string-append > > > > > "https://github.com/googlei18n/nototools/" > > > > > + > > > > > "archive/v2017-09-25-tooling-for-phase3-" > > > > > + "update.tar.gz")) > > > > > + (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz")) > > > > > + (sha256 > > > > > + (base32 > > > > > + > > > > > "1pvacw18cm9l4sb66pqyjc7hc74xhhfxc7kd5ald8lixf4wzg0s8")))) > > > > > + (build-system python-build-system) > > > > > + (arguments > > > > > + `(#:python ,python-2)) > > > > > + (propagated-inputs > > > > > + `(("python2-booleanoperations" ,python2-booleanoperations) > > > > > + ("python2-defcon" ,python2-defcon) > > > > > + ("python2-fonttools" ,python2-fonttools) > > > > > + ("python2-pillow" ,python2-pillow) > > > > > + ("python2-pyclipper" ,python2-pyclipper) > > > > > + ("python2-ufolib" ,python2-ufolib))) > > > > > + (home-page "https://github.com/googlei18n/nototools") > > > > > + (synopsis "Noto fonts support tools and scripts") > > > > > + (description > > > > > + "Nototools is a python package containing python scripts > > > > > used to +maintain the Noto Fonts project.") > > > > > + (license (list license:asl2.0 > > > > > + ;; Sample texts are attributed to UN and > > > > > OHCHR. > > > > > + ;; The permissions on the UDHR are pretty lax: > > > > > + ;; > > > > > http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Pages/Introduction.aspx > > > > > + ;; "If UDHR translations or materials are > > > > > reproduced, users > > > > > + ;; should make reference to this website as a > > > > > source by > > > > > + ;; providing a link." > > > > > + license:public-domain > > > > > + license:non-copyleft > > > > > "file://sample_texts/attributions.txt" > > > > > + "See sample_texts/attributions.txt in the > > > > > distribution.")))) > > > > > > > > This whole patchset looks pretty good to me. I've built all the > > > > packages, but haven't tested them. > > > > > > > > guix lint has one complaint here about the license: > > > > > > > > gnu/packages/fontutils.scm:591:13: nototools@20170925: invalid > > > > license field > > > > > > > > I'm not quite sure what this means. > > > > > > I think I know it, the non-copyleft needs to be adjusted to the list. > > > Thanks. I really should run lint for longer patchseries. I admit I do > > > this not very often. > > > Thanks for your review. > > > > You're welcome :) > > > > It looks to me like the python-fonttools patch could be merged now, > > shall I merge it? I only ask as I don't want to mess up your workflow? > > > I have no time this weekend to work on it, I am busy with other things. > If you want to clean up the bits that are necessary and want to merge > it that would be very kind of you. I've gone ahead and merged the python-fonttools related patch, but I'm not planning to look at the other patches, at least not at the moment :)