From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1uNJ-00019A-AT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:15:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1uND-000877-Aw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:15:09 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1uND-00086y-63 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:15:03 -0400 Subject: [bug#25728] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add colorforth. Resent-Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:13:58 +0000 From: ng0 Message-ID: <20171010131358.mx5cbnbeuvydgwiu@abyayala> References: <871suvu8yu.fsf@elephly.net> <87d1a17e94.fsf@elephly.net> <20170618115947.jo22jym5bm6semng@abyayala> <87shix4d40.fsf@elephly.net> <20170628094810.nt4svpdksevrh5gr@abyayala> <877ez6hkbk.fsf@elephly.net> <8760eqhk11.fsf@elephly.net> <874luahjw4.fsf@elephly.net> <20170723083546.zmq3ypz7nttsdnko@abyayala> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="udr5g44737yblkhv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Konstantin Tcholokachvili Cc: Ricardo Wurmus , "25728@debbugs.gnu.org" <25728@debbugs.gnu.org> --udr5g44737yblkhv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Konstantin Tcholokachvili transcribed 18K bytes: > Hi ng0, >=20 > I've been on holidays and I didn't checked my emails. > Sadly, in fact there is a regression with qemu version 2.6 onwards, I fil= ed a bug report to qemu team but they didn't investigated yet. For the mome= nt the only solution is to: > 1. Use older qemu ; > 2. Usse Bochs. >=20 > This issue was reported here: https://github.com/narke/colorForth/issues/2 >=20 > I'm also writing another implementation of colorForth in C but it's not f= inished yet. >=20 > Regards. >=20 > Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. Hi Konstantin, thanks for filing a bug with upstream. I'll consider sending colorForth in C for QA when it's ready, for now I agree with Ricardos action to close this report. I had other things on my mind, thanks for your patience. --=20 ng0 GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588 GnuPG: https://dist.ng0.infotropique.org/dist/keys/ https://www.infotropique.org https://ng0.infotropique.org --udr5g44737yblkhv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEqIyK3RKYKNfqwC5S4i+bv+40hYgFAlncx5YACgkQ4i+bv+40 hYipDg//Rtw2iwogE8p+xkswAERHwLTvxnhiH1wfWFyC1ojFgaZITL/2VeXyDkh8 gh2XWK8ByLQxpyxGbT4GMoWUiy1o1lOwHXRDGU7JcUQmF/nijY8AC7g8HI6dUnkt IBuKs7D8Tk3c0keSqEEyQu5GPqvQ1jUwT+azZ6cvxD6dBbyFS+YcVgqcmOu36E6v fwxs6OzvL+8f7TvVOzn2J0/zkLMscU6bH+JpATZwUcbbWv0m4GBidFFq9Yok+GY1 7lr/GMlOQ6764WwGGWMRohIUKi4bS+sZ/haA7NZ8d1s8Yyl06YaexHn51VSHPlR2 iUWHo/OhNwk5i7iVqTkymn36QcKh9c+HcPvnMIic+Wp7lbPEDEuU2k3aiP3y/y4y Zxzj7Q9kxyux8Z2js93Sz4X42qF4UviT1mzHAZP7pk1b6A+ofrvyXW2rXBX6wCfG P0WZPf/fTj7uwpTAqz0yMBTuFGjcDwHaTrntgEIaYCR8jfStKEnu5bbHC5BjEeFm c8uN6CsnDJwu55hI0kz1d7K616xMQnwU/miy6dinIWJhiq8dgb5CTIoYDWYMVSas DMQqG9TwY0IQmDYfbt5Q+BWjfVPv+iAXG8t8Y2qZmkMHz/JVD4HU0GBZMS5awepD MdekW8QDdrjX5SEu4yG8QClWuiAxaxPb9p01A4V2NusHFUUkD3s= =CVbS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --udr5g44737yblkhv--